Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gabriele Meyer a Unit of Health Sciences and Education,
University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146
Hamburg, Germany, b Department of Epidemiology and
Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld,
PO Box 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
Correspondence to: I Mühlhauser
Ingrid_Muehlhauser{at}uni-hamburg.de
Objective:
To assess the effects of an intervention
programme designed to increase use of hip protectors in elderly people
in nursing homes.
What is already known on this topic
Hip protectors can effectively prevent hip fractures Adherence to the use of hip protectors is poor What this study adds
Increasing the use of hip protectors resulted in a relative reduction
of hip fractures of about 40%
Design:
Cluster randomised controlled trial with 18 months of follow up.
Setting:
Nursing homes in Hamburg (25 clusters in
intervention group; 24 in control group).
Participants:
Residents with a high risk of falling
(459 in intervention group; 483 in control group).
Intervention:
Single education session for nursing
staff, who then educated residents; provision of three hip protectors per resident in intervention group. Usual care optimised by brief information to nursing staff about hip protectors and provision of two
hip protectors per cluster for demonstration purposes.
Main outcome measure:
Incidence of hip fractures.
Results:
Mean follow up was 15 months for the
intervention group and 14 months for the control group. In total 167 residents in the intervention group and 207 in the control group died
or moved away. There were 21 hip fractures in 21 (4.6%) residents in
the intervention group and 42 hip fractures in 39 (8.1%) residents in
the control group (relative risk 0.57, absolute risk difference
3.5%, 95% confidence interval
7.3% to 0.3%, P=0.072). After adjustment for the cluster randomisation the proportions of fallers who
used a hip protector were 68% and 15% respectively (mean difference 53%, 38% to 67%, P=0.0001). There were 39 other fractures in the intervention group and 38 in the control group.
Conclusion:
The introduction of a structured
education programme and the provision of free hip protectors in nursing homes increases the use of protectors and may reduce the number of hip fractures.
Nursing home residents are at particularly high risk of fracturing a
hip
The use of hip protectors in nursing homes can be substantially
increased by a single session education targeted at nursing staff and
residents and provision of free hip protectors
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+