BMJ 2002;325:1066 ( 9 November )

Papers

Influence of psychological coping on survival and recurrence in people with cancer: systematic review

Mark Petticrew, associate director, ^a Ruth Bell, lecturer, ^b Duncan Hunter, assistant professor. ^c

^a MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, ^b Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, ^c Community Health and Epidemiology, Abramsky Hall, Queens University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

Correspondence to: M Petticrew mark{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk

Objective: To summarise the evidence on the effect of psychological coping styles (including fighting spirit, helplessness/hopelessness, denial, and avoidance) on survival and recurrence in patients with cancer.
Design: Systematic review of published and unpublished prospective observational studies.
Main outcome measures: Survival from or recurrence of cancer.
Results: 26 studies investigated the association between psychological coping styles and survival from cancer, and 11 studies investigated recurrence. Most of the studies that investigated fighting spirit (10 studies) or helplessness/hopelessness (12 studies) found no significant associations with survival or recurrence. The evidence that other coping styles play an important part was also weak. Positive findings tended to be confined to small or methodologically flawed studies; lack of adjustment for potential confounding variables was common. Positive conclusions seemed to be more commonly reported by smaller studies, indicating potential publication bias.
Conclusion: There is little consistent evidence that psychological coping styles play an important part in survival from or recurrence of cancer. People with cancer should not feel pressured into adopting particular coping styles to improve survival or reduce the risk of recurrence.

What is already known on this topic Survival from cancer is commonly thought to be influenced by a person's psychological coping style Some studies have shown that a coping style involving fighting spirit rather than helplessness/hopelessness is associated with survival and recurrence, though the evidence is inconsistent What this study adds This systematic review suggests that there is no consistent association between psychological coping and outcome of cancer Publication bias and methodological flaws in some of the primary studies may explain some of the previous positive findings There is no good evidence to support the development of psychological interventions to promote particular types of coping in an attempt to prolong survival

---

© BMJ 2002
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Psychological coping and cancer

Maggie Watson, Janis Davidson-Homewood, Jo Haviland, Judith Bliss, Alex Mitchell, Manoj Kumar, Mark Petticrew, Ruth Bell, and Duncan Hunter
BMJ 2003 326: 598. [Extract] [Full Text]

Coping style doesn't affect outcome in people with cancer
BMJ 2002 325: 0. [Full Text]

Website of the week: Coping with cancer

Alex Vass
BMJ 2002 325: 1120. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• van Wilgen, C.P., Dijkstra, P.U., Stewart, R.E., Ranchor, A.V., Roodenburg, J.L.N. (2006). Measuring Somatic Symptoms With the CES-D to Assess Depression in Cancer Patients After Treatment: Comparison Among Patients With Oral/Oropharyngeal, Gynecological, Colorectal, and Breast Cancer. Psychosomatics 47: 465-470 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Donnellan, C, Hevey, D, Hickey, A, O'Neill, D (2006). Defining and quantifying coping strategies after stroke: a review.. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 77: 1208-1218 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hayden, J. A., Cote, P., Bombardier, C. (2006). Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.. ANN INTERN MED 144: 427-437 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Watson, M., Davidson-Homewood, J., Haviland, J., Bliss, J., Mitchell, A., Kumar, M., Petticrew, M., Bell, R., Hunter, D. (2003). Psychological coping and cancer. BMJ 326: 598-598 [Full text]  
• (2003). Psychological Coping Styles Do Not Alter Cancer Survival. JWatch Psychiatry 2003: 10-10 [Full text]  
• (2003). Psychological Coping Styles Do Not Alter Cancer Survival. JWatch Gastroenterology 2003: 6-6 [Full text]  
• (2002). Psychological Coping Styles Do Not Alter Cancer Survival. JWatch General 2002: 3-3 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

I doubt that this study is usefull.

Lawrence F Mahoney
bmj.com, 9 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Positive people die too

Gwen M Harlow
bmj.com, 9 Nov 2002 [Full text]

What about quality of life?

Frankie E Campling
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Influence of psychological coping on survival and recurrence: a response to the systematic review (P

Maggie Watson, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Influence of psychological coping on survival - Review is not systematic

Alex J Mitchell, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Mind and Cancer

Alastair J. Cunningham
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2002 [Full text]

A response to the systematic review

Helen J Cooke, et al.
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Psychological coping styles, and cancer survival

Gary M Orr, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2002 [Full text]

Coping with cancer should be a matter of “living in the meanwhile”

Anna V Ciardullo, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Dec 2002 [Full text]

IT REMAINS REASONABLE FOR CANCER PATIENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIGHT FOR RECOVERY

Harold H. Benjamin
bmj.com, 16 Dec 2002 [Full text]

Coping and cancer systematic review: reply

Mark P Petticrew, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Dec 2002 [Full text]

Coping enables quality of life

Arthur Soissons-Segal
bmj.com, 20 Oct 2003 [Full text]

Wrong conclusions drawn from insufficient research

Volker Tschuschke, Prof. Dr.
bmj.com, 9 Oct 2005 [Full text]