Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Anders Beich a Central Research Unit and Department of General
Practice, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, DK-2200
Copenhagen, Denmark, b Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and
Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Ulriksdal 8c, N-5009 Bergen,
Norway
Correspondence to: Anders Beich a.beich{at}gpract.ku.dk
Objective:
To explore the suitability of a screening based intervention for excessive alcohol use by describing the experiences of general practitioners who tried such an intervention in
their everyday practice.
What is already known on this topic
Health authorities recommend the implementation of screening for
excessive alcohol use and a brief intervention to modify drinking
behaviour, but such screening and brief intervention programmes have
not yet proved to be successful What this study adds
The programme disrupts normal patterns of work and cooperation in the
general practice setting while failing to detect and deal with some
problem drinkers
Design:
Qualitative interviews with general
practitioners who had participated in a pragmatic study of a combined
programme of screening and a brief intervention for excessive alcohol
use. Doctors were interviewed either individually or in focus groups. A
computer based, descriptive, phenomenological method was used to
directly analyse the digitally recorded interviews.
Setting and participants:
24 of 39 general
practitioners in four Danish counties who volunteered to take part in
the pragmatic study were interviewed.
Results:
The doctors were surprised at how difficult it was to establish rapport with the patients who had a positive result
on the screening and to ensure compliance with the intervention. Although the doctors considered the doctor-patient relationship robust
enough to sustain targeting of alcohol use, they often failed to follow
up on initial interventions, and some expressed a lack of confidence in
their ability to counsel patients effectively on lifestyle issues. The
doctors questioned the rationale of screening in young drinkers who may
grow out of excessive drinking behaviour. The programme needed
considerable resources, and it interrupted the natural course of
consultations and was inflexible. The doctors could not recommend the
screening and brief intervention programme, although they thought it
important to counsel their patients on drinking.
Conclusions:
Screening for excessive alcohol use
created more problems than it solved for the participating doctors. The results underline the value of carrying out pragmatic studies on the
suitability of seemingly efficacious healthcare programmes.
Efficacy studies have shown that in ideal conditions a brief
intervention in primary care can lower alcohol consumption
General practitioners who have tried a screening and brief intervention
programme in their practice find the extra workload onerous and have
problems in establishing rapport with excessive drinkers located by
screening
Read all Rapid Responses