Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
James Quinn a Division of Emergency Medicine, University of
California at San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA
94143-0208, USA, b Department of Medicine,
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
94118
Correspondence to: J Quinn quinnj{at}medicine.ucsf.edu
Objective:
To assess the difference in clinical
outcome between lacerations of the hand closed with sutures and those treated conservatively.
What is already known on this topic
Wounds heal by second intention if treated without sutures and left
open What this study adds
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Emergency department in a tertiary hospital.
Participants:
Consecutive patients presenting between
16 February and 30 November 2000 with uncomplicated lacerations of the
hand (full thickness <2 cm; without tendon, joint, fracture, or nerve
complications) who would normally require sutures. 154 patients were
eligible, 58 refused, and 5 were missed; 91 patients with 95 lacerations were enrolled.
Intervention:
Participants were randomised to
suturing or conservative treatment.
Main outcome measures:
Primary outcome was cosmetic
appearance after three months, rated on a previously validated visual
analogue scale. Duration of treatment, pain during treatment,
patients' assessment of their outcome, and the time for patients to
resume normal activities were also measured.
Results:
Participants treated with sutures and those treated conservatively did not differ significantly in the assessment of cosmetic appearance by independent blinded doctors after three months: 83 mm v 80 mm, (mean difference 3 (95% confidence
interval
1 to 8) mm) on the visual analogue scale. The mean time to
resume normal activities was the same in both groups (3.4 days).
Patients treated conservatively had less pain (difference 18 (12 to 24) mm) and treatment time was 14 (10 to 18) min shorter.
Conclusion:
Similar cosmetic and functional outcomes
result from either conservative treatment or suturing of small
uncomplicated lacerations of the hand, but conservative treatment is
faster and less painful.
Sutures provide secure and meticulous wound closure, but their
placement is not without associated pain, fear, and increased risk of
infection
Non-suturing of hand lacerations of <2 cm produced similar cosmetic
and functional outcomes to suturing and was faster and less
painful
Read all Rapid Responses