BMJ 2002;325:81-84 ( 13 July )

Information in practice

What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers

Christopher Bartlett, research associate,  Jonathan Sterne, reader in medical statistics,  Matthias Egger, professor of clinical epidemiology. 

MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR

Correspondence to: M Egger, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland egger{at}ispm.unibe.ch

Objective: To assess the characteristics of medical research that is press released by general medical journals and reported in newspapers.
Design: Longitudinal study.
Data sources: All original research articles published in Lancet and BMJ during 1999 and 2000.
Main outcome measures: Inclusion of articles in Lancet or BMJ press releases, and reporting of articles in Times or Sun newspapers.
Results: Of 1193 original research articles, 517 (43%) were highlighted in a press release and 81 (7%) were reported in one or both newspapers. All articles covered in newspapers had been press released. The probability of inclusion in press releases was similar for observational studies and randomised controlled trials, but trials were less likely to be covered in the newspapers (odds ratio 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.37)). Good news and bad news were equally likely to be press released, but bad news was more likely to be reported in newspapers (1.74 (1.07 to 2.83)). Studies of women's health, reproduction, and cancer were more likely to be press released and covered in newspapers. Studies from industrialised countries other than Britain were less likely to be reported in newspapers (0.51 (0.31 to 0.82)), and no studies from developing countries were covered.
Conclusions: Characteristics of articles were more strongly associated with selection for reporting in newspapers than with selection for inclusion in press releases, although each stage influenced the reporting process. Newspapers underreported randomised trials, emphasised bad news from observational studies, and ignored research from developing countries.

What is already known on this topic Newspapers are an important source of information about the results of medical research There are two stages on the path to newspaper coverageselection by medical journal editors of articles to be press released and the selection of newsworthy articles by journalists What this study adds Examination of press releasing by the Lancet and BMJ and reporting by the Times and Sun showed that selection processes acted at both stages The net effect meant that newspapers emphasised results from observational studies, in particular studies of women's health, reproduction, and cancer Good news and bad news were equally likely to be press released, but bad news was more likely to be reported in newspaper articles

---

© BMJ 2002
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Why promote the findings of single research studies?

Paul Wilson, Mark Petticrew on behalf of the Medical Research Council’s Population Health Sciences Research Network knowledge transfer project team
BMJ 2008 336: 722. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J Pocock, Peter C Gøtzsche, Jan P Vandenbroucke STROBE Initiative
BMJ 2007 335: 806-808. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

What is newsworthy?

Lesley Fallowfield and Michael Baum
BMJ 2002 325: 774. [Extract] [Full Text]

RCTs are seldom newsworthy
BMJ 2002 325: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bomlitz, L. J., Brezis, M. (2008). Misrepresentation of health risks by mass media. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 202-204 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wilson, P., Petticrew, M., on behalf of the Medical Research Council's Popula, (2008). Why promote the findings of single research studies?. BMJ 336: 722-722 [Full text]  
• Elm, E. v., Altman, D. G, Egger, M., Pocock, S. J, Gotzsche, P. C, Vandenbroucke, J. P, STROBE Initiative, (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335: 806-808 [Full text]  
• von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., for the STROBE Initiative, (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. ANN INTERN MED 147: 573-577 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• von Elm, E., Antes, G. (2007). Tea without milk: lifestyle advice based on a small lab study. Eur Heart J 28: 1398-1398 [Full text]  
• Takahashi, Y., Miyaki, K., Nakayama, T. (2007). Analysis of news of the Japanese asbestos panic: a supposedly resolved issue that turned out to be a time bomb. J Public Health (Oxf) 29: 62-69 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Armstrong, E. M., Carpenter, D. P., Hojnacki, M. (2006). Whose deaths matter? Mortality, advocacy, and attention to disease in the mass media.. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31: 729-772 [Abstract]  
• Rock, M. (2005). Diabetes Portrayals in North American Print Media: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Am. J. Public Health 95: 1832-1838 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Purvis, J. M., Alexander, A. H., Einhorn, T. A., Griffin, L. Y. (2005). Symposium Evaluating the Flood of Orthopaedic Media and Marketing Information. JBJS 87: 1392-1398 [Full text]  
• von Elm, E., Egger, M. (2004). The scandal of poor epidemiological research. BMJ 329: 868-869 [Full text]  
• Pieters, G., De Gucht, V., Kajosch, H. (2003). Newspaper coverage of psychiatry and general medicine: comparing tabloids with broadsheets. Psychiatr. Bull. 27: 259-260 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kubba, A A (2003). Breast cancer and the pill. JRSM 96: 280-283 [Full text]  
• Lawlor, D. (2002). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease. The Current Status of Research and Practice.: AR Genazzani. London UK, New York USA: The Parthenon Publishing Group, 2001, pp. 188, US$77.95 ISBN: 1 84214 038 8.. Int J Epidemiol 31: 1278-1279 [Full text]  
• Fallowfield, L., Baum, M. (2002). What is newsworthy?. BMJ 325: 774-774 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Bad news for research

Lesley J Fallowfield
bmj.com, 15 Jul 2002 [Full text]

Keep the Faith, Fight the Good Fight etc. etc...

Tony Floyd
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2002 [Full text]

What is newsworthy and the HRT controversy.

Michael Baum
bmj.com, 18 Jul 2002 [Full text]

Presentation, topicality and simplicity assist becoming newsworthy.

Dave M Hambidge, et al.
bmj.com, 31 Jul 2002 [Full text]