Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Alba DiCenso a School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5, b Departments of Clinical
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street
West, Hamilton, Ontario, c Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
McMaster University, 105 Main Street East, Level P1, Hamilton, Ontario,
Canada L8N 1G6, d Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario
Correspondence to: A DiCenso dicensoa{at}mcmaster.ca
Objective:
To review the effectiveness of primary
prevention strategies aimed at delaying sexual intercourse, improving
use of birth control, and reducing incidence of unintended pregnancy in adolescents.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Primary prevention strategies have not reduced the rate of pregnancies
in adolescent women Meta-analysis of five studies, four of which evaluated abstinence
programmes, has shown an increase in pregnancies in partners of male
participants
Data sources:
12 electronic bibliographic databases,
10 key journals, citations of relevant articles, and contact with authors.
Study selection:
26 trials described in 22 published
and unpublished reports that randomised adolescents to an intervention
or a control group (alternate intervention or nothing).
Data extraction:
Two independent reviewers assessed
methodological quality and abstracted data.
Data synthesis:
The interventions did not delay
initiation of sexual intercourse in young women (pooled odds ratio
1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.30) or young men (0.99; 0.84 to 1.16); did not improve use of birth control by young women at every
intercourse (0.95; 0.69 to 1.30) or at last intercourse (1.05; 0.50 to
2.19) or by young men at every intercourse (0.90; 0.70 to 1.16) or at
last intercourse (1.25; 0.99 to 1.59); and did not reduce pregnancy
rates in young women (1.04; 0.78 to 1.40). Four abstinence programmes
and one school based sex education programme were associated with an
increase in number of pregnancies among partners of young male
participants (1.54; 1.03 to 2.29). There were significantly fewer
pregnancies in young women who received a multifaceted programme (0.41;
0.20 to 0.83), though baseline differences in this study favoured the intervention.
Conclusions:
Primary prevention strategies evaluated
to date do not delay the initiation of sexual intercourse, improve use
of birth control among young men and women, or reduce the number of
pregnancies in young women.
Unintended pregnancies among adolescents pose a considerable problem
for the young parents, the child, and society
Primary prevention strategies evaluated to date do not delay the
initiation of sexual intercourse or improve use of birth control among
adolescents
Read all Rapid Responses