Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Guttorm Brattebø a Department of
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021
Bergen, Norway, b HELTEF, Foundation for Health Services Research, PO Box 55, N-1474 Nordbyhagen, Norway, c Paul E Plsek & Associates, 1005 Allenbrook Lane, Roswell, GA
30075, USA
Correspondence to: G Brattebø gbra{at}haukeland.no
Problem:
Need for improved sedation strategy for
adults receiving ventilator support.
Design:
Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The
project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative.
Background and setting:
A general mixed surgical
intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in
the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent
positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours.
Key measures for improvement:
Reduction in patients'
mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a
period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff
perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes.
Strategies for change:
Multiple measures (protocol
development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters,
flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were
tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial.
Effects of change:
Mean ventilator time decreased by
2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days
before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (-0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental
extubations or other incidents were identified.
Lessons learnt:
Relatively simple changes in sedation
practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The
change process was well received by the staff and increased their
interest in identifying other areas for improvement.
Read all Rapid Responses