BMJ 2002;324:1328-1331 ( 1 June )

Education and debate

Quality improvement report

Safety and efficacy of nurse initiated thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Asif Qasim, specialist registrarKerry Malpass, ward manager, coronary care unitDaniel J O'Gorman, consultant cardiologistMary E Heber, consultant cardiologist

Cardiology Department, Princess Royal Hospital, Apley Castle, Telford TF6 6TF

Correspondence to: A Qasim dr{at}asifqasim.freeserve.co.uk

Problem: Delay in starting thrombolytic treatment in patients arriving at hospital with chest pain who are diagnosed as having acute myocardial infarction.
Design: Audit of "door to needle times" for patients presenting with chest pain and an electrocardiogram on admission that confirmed acute myocardial infarction. A one year period in each of three phases of development was studied.
Background and setting: The goal of the national service framework for coronary heart disease is that by April 2002, 75% of eligible patients should receive thrombolysis within 30 minutes of arriving at hospital. A district general hospital introduced a strategy to improve door to needle times. In phase 1 (1989-95), patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, referred by general practitioners, were assessed in the coronary care unit; all other patients were seen first in the accident and emergency department. In phase 2 (1995-7), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to a fast track area within the coronary care unit, where nurses assess patients and doctors started treatment.
Key measures for improvement: Median door to needle time in phase 1 of 45 minutes (range 5-300 minutes), with 38% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Median door to needle time in phase 2 of 40 minutes (range 5-180 minutes), with 47% treated within 30 minutes
Strategies for change: In phase 3 (1997-2001), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to the fast track area and assessed by a "coronary care thrombolysis nurse." If electrocardiography confirmed the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, the nurse could initiate thrombolytic therapy (subject to guidelines and exclusions determined by the consultant cardiologists).
Effects of change: Median door to needle time in phase 3 of 15 minutes (range 5-70 minutes), with 80% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Systematic clinical review showed no cases in which a nurse initiated inappropriate thrombolysis.
Lessons learnt: Thrombolysis started by nurses is safe and effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It may provide a way by which the national service framework's targets for door to needle times can be achieved.



© BMJ 2002

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Focus on emergency departments to reduce delays in thrombolysis
C J L Hetherington, P Doyle, J A Kayani, and D F Gorman
BMJ 2002 325: 901. [Extract] [Full Text]

Nurses improve door to needle time
BMJ 2002 324: 0. [Full Text]

Tales of discovery, obfuscation, error, and improvement
BMJ 2002 324: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Savage, M. W, Channer, K. S (2002). Improving the management of acute myocardial infarction. BMJ 325: 1185-1186 [Full text]  
  • Hetherington, C J L, Doyle, P, Kayani, J A, Gorman, D F (2002). Focus on emergency departments to reduce delays in thrombolysis. BMJ 325: 901-901 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

MAKE A BETTER USE OF NURSES
IŅIGO ROMON-ALONSO
bmj.com, 31 May 2002 [Full text]
Hawthorne Effect Not Accounted For
Thomas F Heston
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction
Mark W Savage
bmj.com, 4 Jun 2002 [Full text]
The main problem for thrombolysis efficacy is still prehospital patient delay.
Jane C. Walsh
bmj.com, 6 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Time to Care, not Time to Door
Peter A West
bmj.com, 6 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Re: Hawthorne Effect Not Accounted For
Kathleen M. Langan
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Use of door to needle times
Steve Goodacre
bmj.com, 11 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Reducing delays to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
Russell C Davis, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2002 [Full text]
Focus on accident and emergency departments to reduce delays
Chris J L Hetherington, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2002 [Full text]
Research: Findings to Implementation
Maree F O'Sullivan
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2002 [Full text]
Caveats of fast- track thrombolysis
Aristotle D Protopapas
bmj.com, 17 Aug 2002 [Full text]
Effective Audit to Reduce Thrombolysis Times
Asif Qasim, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Jan 2003 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ