Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Olive Bennewith a Division of Primary Health
Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, b Department of Social Medicine, University of
Bristol, c Division of Psychiatry, University of
Bristol
Correspondence to: D Sharp debbie.sharp{at}bristol.ac.uk
Objectives:
To evaluate the impact of an intervention based in general practice on the incidence of repeat episodes of
deliberate self harm.
What is already known on this topic
There have been no previous large scale randomised controlled trials of
general practice based interventions aimed at reducing the incidence of
repeat episodes of deliberate self harm What this study adds
Design:
Cluster randomised controlled trial in
which 98 general practices were assigned in equal numbers to an
intervention or a control group. The intervention comprised a letter
from the general practitioner inviting the patient to consult, and
guidelines on assessment and management of deliberate self harm for the
general practitioner to use in consultations. Control patients received usual general practitioner care.
Setting:
General practices within Avon,
Wiltshire, and Somerset Health Authorities, whose patients lived within
the catchment area of four general hospitals in Bristol and Bath.
Participants:
1932 patients registered with the
study practices who had attended accident and emergency departments at
one of the four hospitals after an episode of deliberate self harm.
Main outcome measures:
Primary outcome was
occurrence of a repeat episode of deliberate self harm in the 12 months
after the index episode. Secondary outcomes were number of repeat
episodes and time to first repeat.
Results:
The incidence of repeat episodes of
deliberate self harm was not significantly different for patients in
the intervention group compared with the control group (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.5). Similar findings were obtained
for the number of repeat episodes and time to first repeat. Subgroup
analyses indicated that there was no differential effect of the
intervention according to patient's sex (P=0.51) or method used to
cause deliberate self harm (P=0.64). The treatment seemed to be
beneficial for people with a history of deliberate self harm, but it
was associated with an adverse effect in people for whom the index
episode was their first episode (interaction P=0.017).
Conclusions:
An invitation to consult, sent by
the general practitioner of patients who have deliberately harmed
themselves, and the use of management guidelines during any subsequent
consultation did not reduce the incidence of repeat self harm. A
subgroup analysis that indicated that patients who had previously
harmed themselves benefited from the intervention was inconsistent with
previous evidence and should be treated with caution. More research is needed on how to manage patients who deliberately harm themselves, to
reduce the incidence of repeat episodes.
About two thirds of patients consult their general practitioner in the
three months after an episode of deliberate self harm
An intervention comprising an invitation to consult from a patient's
general practitioner and by the use of guidelines for the assessment
and management of deliberate self harm in a subsequent consultation
does not reduce the incidence of repeat episodes of deliberate self
harm
Read all Rapid Responses