Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John Macleod a Department of
Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
B15 2TT, b Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol,
Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PR, c School of Sport and
Exercise Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15
2TT, d Department of Public Health, University
of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ
Correspondence to: J Macleod
j.a.macleod{at}bham.ac.uk
Objectives:
To examine the association between self
perceived psychological stress and cardiovascular disease in a
population where stress was not associated with social disadvantage.
What is already known on this topic
Exposure to stress and heart disease outcomes were often based on self
report so that a general tendency to negative perceptions may have
generated a spurious association between higher perceived stress and
heart disease symptoms What this study adds
However, stress showed a weakly inverse relation to all objective
indices of heart disease: socially advantaged men perceived themselves
to be most stressed, and the "protective" effect of stress was
probably attributable to residual confounding Suggestions that psychological stress is an important determinant of
heart disease may be premature
Design:
Prospective observational study with follow up of 21 years and repeat screening of half the cohort 5 years from
baseline. Measures included perceived psychological stress, coronary
risk factors, self reported angina, and ischaemia detected by electrocardiography.
Setting:
27 workplaces in Scotland.
Participants:
5606 men (mean age 48 years) at first
screening and 2623 men at second screening with complete data on all
measures
Main outcome measures:
Prevalence of angina and
ischaemia at baseline, odds ratio for incident angina and ischaemia at
second screening, rate ratios for cause specific hospital admission,
and hazard ratios for cause specific mortality.
Results:
Both prevalence and incidence of angina
increased with increasing perceived stress (fully adjusted odds ratio
for incident angina, high versus low stress 2.66, 95% confidence
interval 1.61 to 4.41; P for trend <0.001). Prevalence and incidence
of ischaemia showed weak trends in the opposite direction. High stress was associated with a higher rate of admissions to hospital generally and for admissions related to cardiovascular disease and psychiatric disorders (fully adjusted rate ratios for any general hospital admission 1.13, 1.01 to 1.27, cardiovascular disease 1.20, 1.00 to
1.45, and psychiatric disorders 2.34, 1.41 to 3.91). High stress was
not associated with increased admission for coronary heart disease
(1.00, 0.76-1.32) and showed an inverse relation with all cause
mortality, mortality from cardiovascular disease, and mortality from
coronary heart disease, that was attenuated by adjustment for
occupational class (fully adjusted hazard ratio for all cause mortality
0.94, 0.81 to 1.11, cardiovascular mortality 0.91, 0.78 to 1.06, and
mortality from coronary heart disease 0.98, 0.75 to 1.27).
Conclusions:
The relation between higher stress,
angina, and some categories of hospital admissions probably resulted
from the tendency of participants reporting higher stress to also
report more symptoms. The lack of a corresponding relation with
objective indices of heart disease suggests that these symptoms did not reflect physical disease. The data suggest that associations between psychosocial measures and disease outcomes reported from some other
studies may be spurious.
Higher psychological stress has predicted coronary heart disease in
several observational studies
Perceived stress was strongly related to subjective symptoms of heart
disease, including those leading to hospital admission
Read all Rapid Responses