Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Neil J Preston a Mental Health Directorate, Fremantle Hospital and
Health Service, PO Box 480 Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia, b University Department of Psychiatry at Fremantle Hospital,
University of Western Australia, 16 The Terrace, Fremantle, c Health
Information Centre, Health Department of Western Australia, 189 Royal
Street, East Perth, WA 6004
Correspondence to: N J Preston
neil.preston{at}health.wa.gov.au
Objective:
To examine whether community treatment
orders for psychiatric patients reduce subsequent use of health
services in comparison with control patients not placed on an order.
What is already known on this topic
Studies have often lacked epidemiological sampling frames and control
for possible confounding factors What this study adds
Placement of an order did not predict subsequent use of
services Community treatment orders may not be an effective alternative to
assertive community treatment programmes
Design:
Epidemiological study with a before and
after, two stage design of matching and multivariate analysis,
controlling for sociodemographic variables, clinical features, and
psychiatric history.
Setting:
All community based and inpatient
psychiatric services in Western Australia, covering a population of 1.7 million people.
Participants:
228 subjects placed on a community
treatment order, matched with an equal number of controls to give a
total of 456 patients.
Main outcome measures:
Inpatient admissions, bed
days, and outpatient contacts one year after subjects were placed on a
community treatment order or the index date of matched controls.
Results:
Both subjects and their matched controls had reduced inpatient admissions and bed days in hospital. Subjects had
significantly more outpatient contacts. Multivariate analysis indicated
that being placed on a community treatment order was associated with
increased outpatient contacts in the subsequent year compared with the
control group. Otherwise, orders did not affect subsequent use of
health services. Other factors associated with increased use of health
services were age and inpatient admissions, bed days, and outpatient
contacts before the order or index date. No covariates were shown to be
associated with changes in within pair differences in inpatient
admissions or bed days.
Conclusions:
The introduction of compulsory treatment
in the community does not lead to reduced use of health services.
Various forms of compulsory treatment in the community have been
suggested as being effective in reducing use of services by patients
with mental health disorders
Patients placed on community treatment orders and those not on such
orders had reduced hospital admissions and bed days one year
later