Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Pauline Chiarelli Faculty of
Health, School of Population Health Sciences, University of Newcastle,
Box 24, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Correspondence to: P Chiarelli
Pauline.Chiarelli{at}newcastle.edu.au
Objectives:
To test the effectiveness of a
physiotherapist delivered intervention designed to prevent urinary
incontinence among women three months after giving birth.
What is already known on this topic
The effectiveness of interventions promoting continence in reducing
urinary incontinence in the female population overall has not been
investigated Pelvic floor exercises are widely held to be an important component of
continence promotion programmes What this study adds
Few studies have examined the efficacy of compliance aiding strategies
in helping women adhere to prescribed pelvic floor exercise
programmes
Design:
Prospective randomised controlled trial with women randomised to receive the intervention (which entailed training in pelvic floor exercises and incorporated strategies to improve adherence) or usual postpartum care.
Setting:
Postpartum wards of three tertiary teaching hospitals in the Hunter region, New South Wales, Australia.
Participants:
Women who had forceps or ventouse
deliveries or whose babies had a high birth weight (
4000 g), or
both
676 (348 in the intervention group and 328 in the usual care
group) provided endpoint data at three months.
Main outcome measures:
Urinary incontinence at three
months measured as a dichotomous variable. The severity of incontinence
was also measured. Self report of the frequency of performance of
pelvic floor exercises was recorded.
Results:
At three months after delivery, the
prevalence of incontinence in the intervention group was 31.0% (108 women) and in the usual care group 38.4% (125 women);
difference 7.4% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 14.6%, P=0.044).
At follow up significantly fewer women with incontinence were
classified as severe in the intervention group (10.1%) v
(17.0%), difference 7.0%, 1.6% to 11.8%). The proportions of
women reporting doing pelvic floor exercises at adequate levels was
84% (80% to 88%) for the intervention group and 58% (52% to 63%)
for the usual care group (P=0.001).
Conclusions:
The intervention promoting urinary
continence reduced the prevalence of urinary incontinence after giving
birth, particularly its severity, and promoted the performance of
pelvic floor exercises at adequate levels; both continence and
adherence to the programme were measured at three months after delivery in women who had forceps or ventouse deliveries or babies weighing 4000 g or more.
Intensive pelvic floor exercise programmes can reduce urinary
incontinence in selected groups of female patients
Continence promotion programmes delivered to a selected population are
able to prevent urinary incontinence in that population
© BMJ 2002
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care