Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Phil Edwards a CRASH Trial
Co-ordinating Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health,
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B 1DP, b Cochrane Injuries Group, Department of Epidemiology and
Population Health, c UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford OX2 7LG, d Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University
of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Campus Box C245, 4200 East Ninth
Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA
Correspondence to: P Edwards phil.edwards{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Objective:
To identify methods to increase response
to postal questionnaires.
What is already known on this topic
Non-response to postal questionnaires reduces the effective sample size
and can introduce bias What this study adds
The review has identified effective ways to increase response to postal
questionnaires The review will be updated regularly in the Cochrane
Library
Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires.
Studies reviewed:
292 randomised controlled trials
including 258 315 participants
Intervention reviewed:
75 strategies for influencing
response to postal questionnaires.
Main outcome measure:
The proportion of completed or
partially completed questionnaires returned.
Results:
The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.27) and almost doubled when incentives were not
conditional on response (1.71; 1.29 to 2.26). Response was more likely
when short questionnaires were used (1.86; 1.55 to 2.24). Personalised
questionnaires and letters increased response (1.16; 1.06 to 1.28), as
did the use of coloured ink (1.39; 1.16 to 1.67). The odds of response
were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded
delivery (2.21; 1.51 to 3.25) and increased when stamped return
envelopes were used (1.26; 1.13 to 1.41) and questionnaires were sent
by first class post (1.12; 1.02 to 1.23). Contacting participants
before sending questionnaires increased response (1.54; 1.24 to 1.92),
as did follow up contact (1.44; 1.22 to 1.70) and providing
non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.41; 1.02 to
1.94). Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants
were more likely to be returned (2.44; 1.99 to 3.01), but
questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less
likely to be returned (0.92; 0.87 to 0.98). Questionnaires originating
from universities were more likely to be returned than were
questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations
(1.31; 1.11 to 1.54).
Conclusions:
Health researchers using postal
questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the
strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
Postal questionnaires are widely used in the collection of data in
epidemiological studies and health research
This systematic review includes more randomised controlled trials than
any previously published review or meta-analysis no questionnaire
response
Read all Rapid Responses