Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Helicobacter pylori
positive (CADET-Hp) randomised controlled trial
Naoki Chiba a Division
of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N
3Z5, b Division of Gastroenterology, Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9, c AstraZeneca Canada
Inc, 1004 Middlegate Road, Mississauga, ON, Canada L4Y 1M4
Correspondence to: N Chiba, Surrey GI Clinic/Research,
105-21 Surrey Street West, Guelph, ON, Canada N1H 3R3
chiban{at}on.aibn.com
Objective:
To determine whether a "test for
Helicobacter pylori and treat" strategy improves symptoms
in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care.
What is already known on this topic
Studies of H pylori eradication in patients with
uninvestigated dyspepsia have shown reduced need for endoscopy and thus
significant cost savings compared with a strategy of prompt
endoscopy The "test for H pylori and treat" strategy has been
recommended for uninvestigated dyspepsia, but there have been no
randomised controlled trials showing improvement in symptoms What this study adds
This supports the "test for H pylori and treat"
strategy
Design:
Randomised placebo controlled trial.
Setting:
36 family practices in Canada.
Participants:
294 patients positive for H
pylori (13C- urea breath test) with symptoms of
dyspepsia of at least moderate severity in the preceding month.
Intervention:
Participants were randomised to twice
daily treatment for 7 days with omeprazole 20 mg, metronidazole 500 mg,
and clarithromycin 250 mg or omeprazole 20 mg, placebo metronidazole, and placebo clarithromycin. Patients were then managed by their family
physicians according to their usual care.
Main outcome measures:
Treatment success defined as
no symptoms or minimal symptoms of dyspepsia at the end of one year.
Societal healthcare costs collected prospectively for a secondary
evaluation of actual mean costs.
Results:
In the intention to treat population
(n=294), eradication treatment was significantly more effective than
placebo in achieving treatment success (50% v 36%;
P=0.02; absolute risk reduction=14%; number needed to treat=7,
95% confidence interval 4 to 63). Eradication treatment cured H
pylori infection in 80% of evaluable patients. Treatment success
at one year was greater in patients negative for H pylori
than in those positive for H pylori (54% v 39%;
P=0.02). Eradication treatment reduced mean annual cost by $C53
(
86 to 180) per patient.
Conclusions:
A "test for H pylori with
13C-urea breath test and eradicate" strategy shows
significant symptomatic benefit at 12 months in the management of
primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia.
Dyspepsia is a common problem in primary health care, although
controversy exists about its definition
When given eradication treatment in primary care, H pylori
positive patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia show improvement in
overall dyspepsia symptoms at 12 months
Read all Rapid Responses