Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rachel Jordan a CDSC (West Midlands), Department of Public Health
and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham
B15 2TT, b Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre,
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2RT, c Institute of Child Health,
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B4 6NH, d Department of Public Health
and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham
B15 2TT
Correspondence to: R Jordan
r.e.jordan{at}bham.ac.uk
Objective:
To assess the evidence for the
effectiveness of increasing numbers of drugs in antiretroviral
combination therapy.
What is already known on this topic
Guidance on treatment, however, has predominantly been based on early
reports of research There are no published analyses that assess the effectiveness of the
increasing numbers of drugs used in combination What this study adds
Heterogeneity in the effect estimates seems to result from variable
effectiveness of different drug combinations, trial duration, and
problems with study quality
Design:
Systematic review, meta-analysis, and
meta-regression of fully reported randomised controlled trials. All
studies included compared quadruple versus triple therapy, triple
versus double therapy, double versus monotherapy, or monotherapy versus
placebo or no treatment.
Participants:
Patients with any stage of HIV
infection who had not received antiretroviral therapy.
Main outcome measures:
Changes in disease progression
or death (clinical outcomes); CD4 count and plasma viral load
(surrogate markers).
Search strategy:
Six electronic databases, including
Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, searched up to February 2001.
Results:
54 randomised controlled trials, most of
good quality, with 66 comparison groups were included in the analysis. For both the clinical outcomes and surrogate markers, combinations with
up to and including three (triple therapy) were progressively and
significantly more effective. The odds ratio for disease progression or
death for triple therapy compared with double therapy was 0.6 (95%
confidence interval 0.5 to 0.8). Heterogeneity in effect sizes was
present in many outcomes but was largely related to the drugs used and
trial quality.
Conclusions:
Evidence from randomised controlled
trials supports the use of triple therapy. Research is needed on the effectiveness of quadruple therapies and the relative effectiveness of
specific combinations of drugs.
Triple combination antiretroviral therapy is accepted by clinicians and
patients as the usual treatment for HIV and has evolved through an
incremental strategy in the numbers of drugs combined
The results of this systematic review support the use of triple therapy
but there is inadequate evidence for quadruple or higher
combinations
Read all Rapid Responses