Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Helen Stapleton a Women's Informed Childbearing and Health
Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of
Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7ND, b Carmarthenshire NHS
Trust, West Wales General Hospital, Carmarthen SA31 2AF
Correspondence to: H
Stapleton h.stapleton{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Objective:
To examine the use of evidence based
leaflets on informed choice in maternity services.
What is already known on this topic
High quality information is essential for promoting informed choice but
is insufficient by itself What this study adds
Fear of litigation, power hierarchies, and the technological imperative
in maternity care limited the choices available Health professionals promoted normative practices rather than choice,
and as women valued their opinions this led to the promotion of
informed compliance rather than informed choice
Design:
Non-participant observation of 886 antenatal consultations. 383 in depth interviews with women using maternity services and health professionals providing antenatal care.
Setting:
Women's homes; antenatal and ultrasound
clinics in 13 maternity units in Wales.
Participants:
Childbearing women and health
professionals who provide antenatal care.
Intervention:
Provision of 10 pairs of Informed
Choice leaflets for service users and staff and a training session
in their use.
Main outcome measures:
Participants' views and
commonly observed responses during consultations and interviews.
Results:
Health professionals were positive about the leaflets and their potential to assist women in making informed choices, but competing demands within the clinical environment undermined their effective use. Time pressures limited discussion, and
choice was often not available in practice. A widespread belief that
technological intervention would be viewed positively in the event of
litigation reinforced notions of "right" and "wrong" choices
rather than "informed" choices. Hierarchical power structures resulted in obstetricians defining the norms of clinical practice and
hence which choices were possible. Women's trust in health professionals ensured their compliance with professionally defined choices, and only rarely were they observed asking questions or making
alternative requests. Midwives rarely discussed the contents of the
leaflets or distinguished them from other literature related to
pregnancy. The visibility and potential of the leaflets as evidence
based decision aids was thus greatly reduced.
Conclusions:
The way in which the leaflets were
disseminated affected promotion of informed choice in maternity care.
The culture into which the leaflets were introduced supported existing
normative patterns of care and this ensured informed compliance rather
than informed choice.
Informed Choice leaflets are widely used in maternity care
but little is known about their ability to influence informed choice
and decision making
Time constraints and other pressures on health professionals resulted
in a lack of discussion of the content of the leaflets
Read all Rapid Responses