Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gunther Eysenbach Unit for
Cybermedicine and eHealth, Department of Clinical Social Medicine,
University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str 58, 69115 Heidelberg,
Germany
Correspondence to: G Eysenbach ey{at}yi.com
Objectives:
To describe techniques for retrieval and
appraisal used by consumers when they search for health information on
the internet.
What is already known on this topic
Qualitative data are needed to design educational and technological
innovations to guide consumers to high quality health information What this study adds
Consumers say that when assessing the credibility of a site they
primarily look for the source, a professional design, and a variety of
other criteria In practice, internet users do not check the "about us" sections of
websites, try to find out who authors or owners of the site are, or
read disclaimers or disclosure statements Very few internet users later remember from which websites they
retrieved information or who stood behind the sites
Design:
Qualitative study using focus groups,
naturalistic observation of consumers searching the world wide web in a
usability laboratory, and in-depth interviews.
Participants:
A total of 21 users of the internet
participated in three focus group sessions. 17 participants were given
a series of health questions and observed in a usability laboratory
setting while retrieving health information from the web; this was
followed by in-depth interviews.
Setting:
Heidelberg, Germany.
Results:
Although their search technique was often suboptimal, internet users successfully found health information to
answer questions in an average of 5 minutes 42 seconds (median 4 minutes 18 seconds) per question. Participants in focus groups said
that when assessing the credibility of a website they primarily looked
for the source, a professional design, a scientific or official touch,
language, and ease of use. However, in the observational study, no
participants checked any "about us" sections of websites, disclaimers, or disclosure statements. In the post-search interviews, it emerged that very few participants had noticed and remembered which
websites they had retrieved information from.
Conclusions:
Further observational studies are needed
to design and evaluate educational and technological innovations for
guiding consumers to high quality health information on the web.
Little is known about how consumers retrieve and assess the quality of
health information on the internet
Users of the internet explore only the first few links on general
search engines when seeking health information
© BMJ 2002
Read all Rapid Responses