Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gene Feder a Department of General
Practice and Primary Care, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School
of Medicine and Dentistry, London EN1 4NS, b Department of Research and Development, Kensington
and Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority, London W2
6LX, c Bart's
and The London NHS Trust, Cardiac Directorate, London E2
9JX
Correspondence to: G Feder
g.s.feder{at}qmul.ac.uk
Objectives:
To compare rates of revascularisation in
south Asian and white patients undergoing coronary angiography in
relation to the appropriateness of revascularisation and clinical outcome.
What is already known on this topic
Studies in England comparing revascularisation in white and south Asian
patients have been too small for conclusive results and have not
considered appropriateness of treatment What this study adds
Physician bias did not explain these differences nor did socioeconomic
status of patients The differences in treatment did not result in large differences in
clinical outcome
Design:
Prospective cohort study of patients with two
and a half years' follow up; appropriateness of revascularisation rated by nine experts with no knowledge of ethnicity of patient.
Setting:
Tertiary cardiac centre in London with
referral from five contiguous health authorities.
Participants:
Consecutive patients (502 south Asian,
2974 white) undergoing coronary angiography in the appropriateness of
coronary revascularisation study (ACRE).
Main outcome measures:
Coronary revascularisation,
non-fatal myocardial infarction, mortality.
Results:
There was no difference between south Asian and white patients in the proportions deemed appropriate for
revascularisation (72% (361) v 68% (2022)) or in the
proportions for whom the physician's intended management was
revascularisation (39% (196) v 41% (1218)). Among patients
appropriate for revascularisation, age adjusted rates of coronary
angioplasty (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.00, P=0.058) and coronary artery bypass grafting (0.74, 0.58 to 0.91, P=0.007) were lower in south Asian than in white patients. These
differences were smaller but still present after adjustment for
socioeconomic status and after restriction of analysis to those
patients for whom the intended management was revascularisation. There
were no differences in mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction
between south Asian and white patients (1.07, 0.78 to 1.47).
Conclusion:
Among patients deemed appropriate for
coronary artery bypass grafting, south Asian patients are less likely
than white patients to receive it. This difference is not explained by
physician bias.
US studies have shown inequity in use of cardiac revascularisation
procedures between white patients and African-Americans
Rates of coronary revascularisation among comparable patients with
coronary artery disease are lower among south Asian patients than white
patients
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.