Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
implications for the assessment of asylum seekers:
repeated interviews study
Jane Herlihy a Traumatic Stress Clinic, London W1T 4PL, b University College, University of London, London WC1E 6BT
Correspondence to: J Herlihy
jane{at}herlihyj.freeserve.co.uk
Objective:
To investigate the consistency of
autobiographical memory of people seeking asylum, in light of the
assumption that discrepancies in asylum seekers' accounts of
persecution mean that they are fabricating their stories.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Refugees with high levels of post-traumatic stress are more likely to
give inconsistent accounts if they have a long time to wait between
interviews Interviewees are more likely to be inconsistent in details that they
rate as peripheral to their experiences than details they consider to
be central Inconsistent recall does not necessarily imply that asylum seekers are
fabricating their accounts
Design:
Repeated interviews.
Setting:
England, 1999 and 2000.
Participants:
Community sample of 27 Kosovan and
12 Bosnian refugees.
Main outcome measures:
Discrepancies in repeated
descriptions of one traumatic and one non-traumatic event, including
specific details, rated as central or peripheral to the event. Self
report measures of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.
Results:
Discrepancies between an individual's
accounts were common. For participants with high levels of
post-traumatic stress, the number of discrepancies increased with
length of time between interviews. More discrepancies occurred in
details peripheral to the account than in details that were central to
the account.
Conclusion:
The assumption that inconsistency of
recall means that accounts have poor credibility is questionable.
Discrepancies are likely to occur in repeated interviews. For refugees
showing symptoms of high levels of post-traumatic stress, the length of the application process may also affect the number of discrepancies. Recall of details rated by the interviewee as peripheral to the account
is more likely to be inconsistent than recall of details that are
central to the account. Thus, such inconsistencies should not be
relied on as indicating a lack of credibility.
Discrepancies between accounts of an event are often used to judge the
credibility of asylum seekers
Discrepancies arise between two accounts of the same event even when
there is no reason for fabrication
Read all Rapid Responses