Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Edgar Jones a Department of Psychological
Medicine, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine,
London SE5 8AZ, b King's College London at the Joint Services Command and Staff
College, Watchfield, c Institute of Psychiatry, London, d Royal Defence Medical College, Fort
Blockhouse, Gosport, e Office of Public Health and Environmental Hazards, Department
of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC, USA
Correspondence to: E Jones
E.Jones{at}hogarth7.demon.co.uk
Objectives:
To discover whether post-combat syndromes have existed after modern wars and what relation they bear to each other.
What is already known on this topic
Post-combat syndromes have been described after most modern conflicts
from the US civil war onwards What this study adds
The ever changing form of post-combat syndromes seems to be related to
advances in medical understanding, the developing nature of warfare,
and cultural undercurrents Because reported symptoms are subject to bias and changing emphasis
related to advances in medical science or the discovery of new
diseases, the characterisation of individual syndromes has to be
treated with caution Attributions by servicemen are generally consistent with symptom
characteristics, though there seems to be a growing reluctance to
consider the stress of military service as a
cause
Design:
Review of medical and military records of servicemen and cluster analysis of symptoms.
Data sources:
Records for 1856 veterans randomly
selected from war pension files awarded from 1872 and from the Medical Assessment Programme for Gulf war veterans.
Main outcome measures:
Characteristic patterns of
symptom clusters and their relation to dependent variables including
war, diagnosis, predisposing physical illness, and exposure to combat;
and servicemen's changing attributions for post-combat disorders.
Results:
Three varieties of post-combat disorder were identified
a debility syndrome (associated with the 19th and early 20th centuries), somatic syndrome (related primarily to the first world
war), and a neuropsychiatric syndrome (associated with the second world
war and the Gulf conflict). The era in which the war occurred was
overwhelmingly the best predictor of cluster membership.
Conclusions:
All modern wars have been associated with a syndrome characterised by unexplained medical symptoms. The form that
these assume, the terms used to describe them, and the explanations
offered by servicemen and doctors seem to be influenced by advances in
medical science, changes in the nature of warfare, and underlying
cultural forces.
Service in the Gulf war is associated with an increased rate of
reported symptoms and worsening subjective health
There seems to be no single post-combat syndrome but a number of
variations on a theme
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+