Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sander Koning a Department of General
Practice, Erasmus University and University Hospital Rotterdam, Room Ff
325, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands, b Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus University and
University Hospital Rotterdam, c Department of Medical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University and University
Hospital Rotterdam, d Department of Dermato-venereology, Erasmus University and
University Hospital Rotterdam
Correspondence to: J C van der
Wouden vanderwouden{at}hag.fgg.eur.nl
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that fusidic acid
would not increase the treatment effect of disinfecting with
povidone-iodine alone in children with impetigo.
What is already known on this topic
Fusidic acid, which is advocated as topical treatment in several
countries, has never been investigated in a placebo controlled study What this study adds
None of the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated at
baseline showed resistance to fusidic acid The value of treatment with povidone-iodine alone can be
questioned
Design:
Randomised placebo controlled trial.
Setting:
General practices in Greater Rotterdam.
Participants:
184 children aged 0-12 years with impetigo.
Main outcome measures:
Clinical cure and
bacterial cure after one week.
Results:
After one week of treatment 55% of the
patients in the fusidic acid group were clinically cured compared with 13% in the placebo group (odds ratio 12.6, 95% confidence interval 5.0 to 31.5, number needed to treat 2.3). After two weeks and four
weeks the differences in cure rates between the two groups had become
smaller. More children in the placebo group were non-compliant (12 v 5) and received extra antibiotic treatment (11 v 3), and more children in the placebo group reported
adverse effects (19 v 7). Staphylococcus aureus
was found in 96% of the positive cultures; no strains were resistant
to fusidic acid.
Conclusions:
Fusidic acid is much more effective
than placebo (when both are given in combination with povidone-iodine shampoo) in the treatment of impetigo. Because of the low rate of cure
and high rate of adverse events in the placebo group, the value of
povidone-iodine in impetigo can be questioned.
Impetigo is the most common skin infection in children
In combination with povidone-iodine, treatment with fusidic acid is
much more effective than placebo
Read all Rapid Responses