Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Richard G A Feachem a Institute
for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco and
Berkeley, CA 94105, b Healthcare Redesign Group, Alameda, CA
94502
Correspondence to: R Feachem
rfeachem{at}psg.ucsf.edu
Objective:
To compare the costs and performance of
the NHS with those of an integrated system for financing and delivery health services (Kaiser Permanente) in California.
What is already known on this topic
The overall healthcare system in the United States is more expensive
than the NHS and population health outcomes are no better The US healthcare system comprises many discrete and unique subsystems,
including the health maintenance organisations What this paper adds
Kaiser's superior performance is mainly in prompt and appropriate
diagnosis and treatment These findings challenge the widely held view that the NHS is efficient
and that its inadequacies are mainly due to
underinvestment
Methods:
The adjusted costs of the two systems and their performance were compared with respect to inputs, use, access to
services, responsiveness, and limited quality indicators.
Results:
The per capita costs of the two systems,
adjusted for differences in benefits, special activities, population
characteristics, and the cost environment, were similar to within 10%.
Some aspects of performance differed. In particular, Kaiser members
experience more comprehensive and convenient primary care services and
much more rapid access to specialist services and hospital admissions. Age adjusted rates of use of acute hospital services in Kaiser were one
third of those in the NHS.
Conclusions:
The widely held beliefs that the NHS is
efficient and that poor performance in certain areas is largely
explained by underinvestment are not supported by this analysis. Kaiser achieved better performance at roughly the same cost as the NHS because
of integration throughout the system, efficient management of hospital
use, the benefits of competition, and greater investment in information technology.
Comparisons of healthcare systems in different countries have to be
undertaken with great care but can be instructive
An integrated, non-profit health maintenance organisation in California
(Kaiser Permanente), with over six million members, costs about the
same as the NHS but performs considerably better
Read all Rapid Responses