BMJ 2001;323:1224-1227 ( 24 November )

Primary care

Quality improvement report

A laboratory based intervention to improve appropriateness of lipid tests and audit cholesterol lowering in primary care

W Stuart A Smellie, consultant chemical pathologistRuth Lowrie, biomedical scientistEmma Wilkinson, research assistant

Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD

Correspondence to: W S A Smellie info{at}smellie.com

Problem: A need exists to reduce inequalities in lipid testing, to provide relevant, individual, patient based interpretation for users, and to audit lipid lowering in primary care.
Design: Model to compare laboratory activity between different general practices; construction of computer based strategies to define the lipid tests to be done and to interpret results for primary and secondary coronary prevention patients; introduction of the strategies into routine use; monitoring of any change after the intervention; and investigation of the potential of the strategies to produce audit data for primary care groups.
Background and setting: Hospital clinical laboratory serving 22 general practices covering 150 000 patients in Bishop Auckland area County Durham.
Key measurements for improvement: Reduction in differences in testing for the different serum lipids in coronary prevention. Production of usable audit data for the primary care groups involved.
Strategies for change: Four different categories of coronary prevention patient, with, for each category, the defined lipid tests to be done and advice to be given (based on the results), using the computer based strategies.
Effects of change: Standardised test activity and the qualitative profile of the tests performed changed significantly. The strategies were readily adopted (median use 78%) within six months of introduction.
Lessons learnt: Computer based strategies can correct qualitative and quantitative differences in test requesting, provide interpretative guidance in accordance with national guidelines, and offer a cost effective model to monitor results of cholesterol lowering in general practice.



© BMJ 2001

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Hypertriglyceridaemia in diabetes
W Stuart A Smellie
BMJ 2006 333: 1257-1260. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Laboratories can help GPs to follow guidelines on lipid testing
BMJ 2001 323: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., Smellie, S. (2008). Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study. Fam Pract 25: 279-286 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., Smellie, S. (2008). Improving the appropriateness of laboratory submissions for urinalysis from general practice. Fam Pract 25: 272-278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Smellie, W S. A (2006). Hypertriglyceridaemia in diabetes. BMJ 333: 1257-1260 [Full text]  
  • Smellie, W S A, Forth, J, Bareford, D, Twomey, P, Galloway, M J, Logan, E C M, Smart, S R S, Reynolds, T M, Waine, C (2006). Best practice in primary care pathology: review 3.. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 781-789 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bailey, J, Jennings, A, Parapia, L (2005). Change of pathology request forms can reduce unwanted requests and tests. J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 853-855 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Connor, P. J. (2003). Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Care Improvement: Are we waiting for Godot?. Diabetes Care 26: 942-943 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ