BMJ 2001;323:1151-1155 ( 17 November )

Papers

Interferon alfa with or without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C: systematic review of randomised trials

Editorial by Davis

Lise L Kjaergard, research fellow, a Kim Krogsgaard, research director, b Christian Gluud, chief physician. a

a Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, H:S Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, b Clinical Research Unit, H:S Hvidovre Hospital, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark

Correspondence to: L L Kjaergard kjaergard{at}ctu.rh.dk

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa with or without ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
Design: Systematic review of randomised trials on interferon alfa plus ribavirin combination therapy versus interferon alfa. Patients were naive (not previously treated with interferon), relapsers (transient response to previous interferon therapy), or non-responders (no response to previous interferon therapy).
Studies reviewed: Of 1155 references identified, 48 trials with 6585 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were followed to the end of treatment in 20 trials and in 28 trials for 12-96 weeks after treatment.
Main outcome measures: Virological response and morbidity plus mortality.
Results: Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response for 6 months by 26% in naive patients (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.78), 33% in relapsers (0.67, 0.57 to 0.78), and 11% in non-responders (0.89, 0.83 to 0.96). Morbidity and mortality showed a non-significant trend in favour of combination therapy (Peto odds ratio 0.45, 0.19 to 1.06). Combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having improvement in results of histology by 17% in naive patients (0.83, 0.74 to 0.93) and by 27% in relapsers and non-responders (0.73, 0.66 to 0.82). The risk of treatment discontinuations was significantly higher after combination therapy (1.28, 1.07 to 1.52).
Conclusion: Treatment with interferon alfa plus ribavirin has a significant beneficial effect on the virological and histological responses of patients with chronic hepatitis C, irrespective of previous treatment. Combination therapy may therefore also be considered appropriate for relapsers and non-responders.


What is already known on this subject
Interferon alfa was the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C until the late 1990s

Combination therapy is recommended for previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C, but the benefit of treating relapsers and non-responders to previous treatment with interferon remains controversial

The effect of treatment on liver related morbidity and mortality has not been established

What this study adds
Combination therapy is more effective in treating hepatitis C than interferon alfa alone in naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders

Combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological or histological response irrespective of previous treatment and may therefore also be considered in relapsers and non-responders to previous treatment

The data indicate a non-significant trend towards a beneficial effect on morbidity plus mortality rates



© BMJ 2001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Interferon alfa plus ribavirin combination therapy benefits patients with chronic hepatitis C
BMJ 2001 323: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C
Gary L Davis
BMJ 2001 323: 1141-1142. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Khader, Y. S., Dweek, A., Alkafajei, A., Rabi', A. Z. (2006). Combination Therapy of Interferon and Ribavirin Versus Interferon Monotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 19: 265-274 [Abstract]  
  • Gluud, L. L. (2006). Bias in Clinical Intervention Research. Am J Epidemiol 163: 493-501 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research. JAMA 294: 218-228 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chou, R., Clark, E. C., Helfand, M. (2004). Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 140: 465-479 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Henderson, D. K. (2003). Managing Occupational Risks for Hepatitis C Transmission in the Health Care Setting. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 546-568 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schlaak, J. F., Hilkens, C. M. U., Costa-Pereira, A. P., Strobl, B., Aberger, F., Frischauf, A.-M., Kerr, I. M. (2002). Cell-type and Donor-specific Transcriptional Responses to Interferon-alpha . USE OF CUSTOMIZED GENE ARRAYS. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 49428-49437 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kuehne, F. C., Bethe, U., Freedberg, K., Goldie, S. J. (2002). Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 162: 2545-2556 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2002). Additional articles abstracted in ACP Journal Club. Evid. Based Med. 7: 99-99 [Full text]  
  • (2002). Treating Hepatitis C: Ribavirin Complements Interferon Therapy. JWatch General 2002: 4-4 [Full text]  
  • Davis, G. L (2001). Treatment of chronic hepatitis C. BMJ 323: 1141-1142 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Genotype 1 may require a different treatment
Regina Stroebele
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ