Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study

doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1100

BMJ 2001;323:1100 ( 10 November )

Primary care

Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study

A C Freeman, general practice research facilitator, K Sweeney, general practice research facilitator.

Somerset and North and East Devon Primary Care Research Network, Institute of General Practice, School of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Sciences, Exeter EX2 5DW

Correspondence to: A C Freeman PCRN{at}exeter.ac.uk

Objectives: To explore the reasons why general practitionersdo not always implement bestevidence.
Design: Qualitative study using Balint-stylegroups.
Setting: Primarycare.
Participants: 19 generalpractitioners.
Main outcome measures: Identifiable themes that indicate barrierstoimplementation.
Results: Six main themes were identified that affectedthe implementation process: the personal and professional experiencesof the general practitioners; the patient-doctor relationship;a perceived tension between primary and secondary care; generalpractitioners' feelings about their patients and the evidence;and logistical problems. Doctors are aware that their choice ofwords with patients can affect patients' decisions and whetherevidence isimplemented.
Conclusions: General practitioner participants seem toact as a conduit within the consultation and regard clinical evidenceas a square peg to fit in the round hole of the patient's life.The process of implementation is complex, fluid, andadaptive.

What is already known on this topic
General practitioners do not always act on evidence in clinical practice

General practitioners are reluctant to jeopardise their relationship with the patient and sometimes feel that patients are unwilling to take drugs

What this study adds
Implementation of evidence by general practitioners is a complex and fluid process

Decisions are influenced by the doctor's personal and professional experience as well as by their knowledge of and relationship with the patient

Doctors' choice of words can influence patients' decisions about treatment

© BMJ 2001

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

Technorati What's this?

Relevant Articles

Personal knowledge: Kieran Sweeney
BMJ 2006 332: 129-130. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impact of adverse events on prescribing warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: matched pair analysis: Niteesh K Choudhry, Geoffrey M Anderson, Andreas Laupacis, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Sharon-Lise T Normand, and Stephen B Soumerai
BMJ 2006 332: 141-145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Doctors and managers: Hugo Mascie-Taylor, Tim Wilson, Kieran Sweeney, Mayur Lakhani, Thomas Plochg, Kiki Lombarts, Yolande Witman, Niek Klazinga, and Karen Kruijthof
BMJ 2003 326: 656. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: John Temple, Simon de Lusignan, Sally Wells, and Andrew Singleton
BMJ 2002 324: 674. [Extract] [Full Text]

The agonies of evidence
BMJ 2001 323: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Personal and patient feelings affect how GPs apply clinical evidence
BMJ 2001 323: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

Beaulieu, M.-D., Proulx, M., Jobin, G., Kugler, M., Gossard, F., Denis, J.-L., Larouche, D. (2008). When Is Knowledge Ripe for Primary Care?: An Exploratory Study on the Meaning of Evidence. Eval Health Prof 31: 22-42 [Abstract]
Kunz, R, Wegscheider, K, Guyatt, G, Zielinski, W, Rakowsky, N, Donner-Banzhoff, N, Muller-Lissner, S (2007). Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication. A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care 16: 456-461 [Abstract] [Full text]
James, E. L., Fraser, C., Anderson, K., Judd, F. (2007). Use of research by the Australian health promotion workforce. Health Educ Res 22: 576-587 [Abstract] [Full text]
Harris, M, Smith, B J, Veale, A, Esterman, A, Frith, P A, Selim, P (2006). Providing patients with reviews of evidence about COPD treatments: a controlled trial of outcomes. Chronic Respiratory Disease 3: 133-140 [Abstract]
Tully, M. P., Cantrill, J. A. (2006). The validity of explicit indicators of prescribing appropriateness. Int J Qual Health Care 18: 87-94 [Abstract] [Full text]
Sweeney, K. (2006). Personal knowledge. BMJ 332: 129-130 [Full text]
Choudhry, N. K, Anderson, G. M, Laupacis, A., Ross-Degnan, D., Normand, S.-L. T, Soumerai, S. B (2006). Impact of adverse events on prescribing warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: matched pair analysis. BMJ 332: 141-145 [Abstract] [Full text]
Burkiewicz, J. S, Zgarrick, D. P (2005). Evidence-Based Practice by Pharmacists: Utilization and Barriers. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 1214-1219 [Abstract] [Full text]
Walker, J., Mathers, N. (2004). Working together: a qualitative study of effective group formation amongst GPs during a cost-driven prescribing initiative. Fam Pract 21: 552-558 [Abstract] [Full text]
Schunemann, H. J., Cook, D., Grimshaw, J., Liberati, A., Heffner, J., Tapson, V., Guyatt, G. (2004). Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 126: 688S-696S [Abstract] [Full text]
Lipman, T., Murtagh, M. J, Thomson, R. (2004). How research-conscious GPs make decisions about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 21: 290-298 [Abstract] [Full text]
Bindels, R., Hasman, A., Derickx, M., van Wersch, J. W. J., Winkens, R. A. G. (2003). User satisfaction with a real-time automated feedback system for general practitioners: a quantitative and qualitative study. Int J Qual Health Care 15: 501-508 [Abstract] [Full text]
Jette, D. U, Bacon, K., Batty, C., Carlson, M., Ferland, A., Hemingway, R. D, Hill, J. C, Ogilvie, L., Volk, D. (2003). Evidence-Based Practice: Beliefs, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviors of Physical Therapists. ptjournal 83: 786-805 [Abstract] [Full text]
Getz, L., Sigurdsson, J. A, Hetlevik, I. (2003). Is opportunistic disease prevention in the consultation ethically justifiable?. BMJ 327: 498-500 [Full text]
de Lusignan, S. (2003). What Is Primary Care Informatics?. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10: 304-309 [Abstract] [Full text]
Jacobson, L., Elwyn, G., Robling, M., Jones, R. T. (2003). Error and safety in primary care: no clear boundaries. Fam Pract 20: 237-241 [Abstract] [Full text]
Gray, D. P., Evans, P., Sweeney, K., Lings, P., Seamark, D., Seamark, C., Dixon, M., Bradley, N. (2003). Towards a theory of continuity of care. JRSM 96: 160-166 [Full text]
DeWilde, S, Carey, I M, Bremner, S A, Richards, N, Hilton, S R, Cook, D G (2003). Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?. Heart 89: 417-421 [Abstract] [Full text]
Mascie-Taylor, H., Wilson, T., Sweeney, K., Lakhani, M., Plochg, T., Lombarts, K., Witman, Y., Klazinga, N., Kruijthof, K. (2003). Doctors and managers. BMJ 326: 656-656 [Full text]
Rousseau, N., McColl, E., Newton, J., Grimshaw, J., Eccles, M. (2003). Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 326: 314-314 [Abstract] [Full text]
Prosser, H., Almond, S., Walley, T. (2003). Influences on GPs' decision to prescribe new drugs--the importance of who says what. Fam Pract 20: 61-68 [Abstract] [Full text]
Fuat, A., Hungin, A P. S, Murphy, J. J. (2003). Barriers to accurate diagnosis and effective management of heart failure in primary care: qualitative study. BMJ 326: 196-196 [Abstract] [Full text]
Decramer, M., Roussos, C. (2003). Early detection: introduction. Eur Respir J 21: 1S-2s [Full text]
Partridge, M.R. (2003). Translating research into practice: how are guidelines implemented?. Eur Respir J 21: 23S-29s [Abstract] [Full text]
Green, R., Kwok, S., Durrington, P.N. (2002). Preventing cardiovascular disease in hypertension: effects of lowering blood pressure and cholesterol. QJM 95: 821-826 [Abstract] [Full text]
Ghosh, A. K., Huang, E. S., Stafford, R. S. (2002). Adherence to Evidence-Based Therapy: Some Practical Problems. Arch Intern Med 162: 1310-1311 [Full text]
Haynes, R B., Devereaux, P J, Guyatt, G. H (2002). Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ 324: 1350-1350 [Full text]
Nissen, M., Del Mar, C. (2002). GPs should reduce antibiotic use with alternative treatments. BMJ 324: 1099-1099 [Full text]
Ely, J. W, Osheroff, J. A, Ebell, M. H, Chambliss, M L., Vinson, D. C, Stevermer, J. J, Pifer, E. A (2002). Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 324: 710-710 [Abstract] [Full text]
Temple, J., de Lusignan, S., Wells, S., Singleton, A. (2002). Why general practitioners do not implement evidence. BMJ 324: 674-674 [Full text]
(2002). Will That Study Change Your Practice?. JWatch Emergency Med. 2002: 10-10 [Full text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The complex relation between GPs and evidence.: Sergio Stagnaro
bmj.com, 9 Nov 2001 [Full text]
It appears evidence based practice is a skill that must be taught.: Stephen Workman
bmj.com, 9 Nov 2001 [Full text]
best practice is best in general practice: Paul McDonald
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2001 [Full text]
"Old habits": Peter Lake
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Better communication helps: Kyle Perrin
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Noncompliance may be justifiable: Joseph Watine
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Making evidence easy for general practitioners: Rule 3-30: Enrique S�nchez-Delgado
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Re: Making evidence easy for general practitioners: Rule 3-30: D A Fitzmaurice
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Implementing evidence in general practice: Derek Mitchell
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Knowledge Management, a balanced approach.: Sally Wells
bmj.com, 21 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Why GPs do not apply evidence: the importance of identifying barriers and facilitators: Chris Salisbury
bmj.com, 22 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Re: Implementing evidence in general practice: David Syme
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Evidence is slippery stuff: John Temple
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2001 [Full text]