BMJ 2001;323:896 ( 20 October )

Papers

Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma

David Brocklebank, specialist registrar in respiratory medicinea John Wright, consultant in clinical epidemiology and public healtha Christopher Cates, general practitionerb on behalf of the National Health Technology Assessment Inhaler Review Group.

a Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ, b Manor View Practice, Bushey Health Centre, Bushey, Hertfordshire WD2 2NN

Correspondence to: J Wright john.wright{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk

Objective: To determine the clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers (with or without spacer) compared with other hand held inhaler devices for the delivery of corticosteroids in stable asthma.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: Cochrane Airways Group trials database (Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled clinical trials register, and hand searching of 18 relevant journals), pharmaceutical companies, and bibliographies of included trials.
Trials: All trials in children or adults with stable asthma that compared a pressurised metered dose inhaler with any other hand held inhaler device delivering the same inhaled corticosteroid.
Results: 24 randomised controlled trials were included. Significant differences were found for forced expiratory volume in one second, morning peak expiratory flow rate, and use of drugs for additional relief with dry powder inhalers. However, either these were within clinically equivalent limits or the differences were not apparent once baseline characteristics had been taken into account. No significant differences were found between pressurised metered dose inhalers and any other hand held inhaler device for the following outcomes: lung function, symptoms, bronchial hyper-reactivity, systemic bioavailability, and use of additional relief bronchodilators.
Conclusions: No evidence was found that alternative inhaler devices (dry powder inhalers, breath actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers, or hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered dose inhalers) are more effective than the pressurised metered dose inhalers for delivery of inhaled corticosteroids. Pressurised metered dose inhalers remain the most cost effective first line delivery devices.


What is already known on this topic
Many inhaler devices are available for administering inhaled corticosteroids

Current guidelines for their use are inconsistent and not evidence based

What this study adds
This systematic review found no evidence that alternative inhaler devices are more effective than pressurised metered dose inhalers for giving inhaled corticosteroids.

Pressurised metered dose inhalers (or the cheapest device) should be first line treatment in all patients with stable asthma




© BMJ 2001

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Metered dose inhalers are most cost effective for asthma drugs
BMJ 2001 323: 0. [Full Text]

Related external webpages:

NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Blanchard, A. R, Golish, J. A (2002). Review: pressurised metered dose inhalers are as effective as other hand held inhalers for corticosteroid use in asthma. Evid. Based Med. 7: 78-78 [Full text]  
  • Cicutto, L. (2002). Review: pressurised metered dose inhalers are as effective as other hand held inhalers for delivering corticosteroids in stable asthma. Evid. Based Nurs. 5: 44-44 [Full text]  
  • (2001). Metered-Dose Inhalers for Delivering Inhaled Steroids and {beta}2-Agonists. JWatch General 2001: 2-2 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Patients can't use pMDI's in real life
Brian J Lipworth
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Cheapest is best?
Ian Williams
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Meta-analysis: more stress on analysis please
Stephen Senn
bmj.com, 27 Oct 2001 [Full text]
factual and methodological errors
Richard Spiers
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Systematic reviews of asthma inhalers – not generalisable without subject details
Patrick T White
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Meta-Madness
Alyn H Morice
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Oh Dear
Mark Everard
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ