Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David Brocklebank a Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford Royal
Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ, b Manor View Practice, Bushey Health Centre, Bushey,
Hertfordshire WD2 2NN
Correspondence to: J Wright
john.wright{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk
Objective:
To determine the clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers (with or without spacer) compared with other hand held inhaler devices for the delivery of
corticosteroids in stable asthma.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources:
Cochrane Airways Group trials database
(Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled clinical trials register, and
hand searching of 18 relevant journals), pharmaceutical companies, and
bibliographies of included trials.
Trials:
All trials in children or adults with stable asthma that compared a pressurised metered dose inhaler with any other
hand held inhaler device delivering the same inhaled corticosteroid.
Results:
24 randomised controlled trials were
included. Significant differences were found for forced expiratory
volume in one second, morning peak expiratory flow rate, and use of
drugs for additional relief with dry powder inhalers. However, either these were within clinically equivalent limits or the differences were
not apparent once baseline characteristics had been taken into account.
No significant differences were found between pressurised metered dose
inhalers and any other hand held inhaler device for the following
outcomes: lung function, symptoms, bronchial hyper-reactivity, systemic
bioavailability, and use of additional relief bronchodilators.
Conclusions:
No evidence was found that alternative
inhaler devices (dry powder inhalers, breath actuated pressurised
metered dose inhalers, or hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered dose
inhalers) are more effective than the pressurised metered dose inhalers for delivery of inhaled corticosteroids. Pressurised metered dose inhalers remain the most cost effective first line delivery devices.
Many inhaler devices are available for administering inhaled
corticosteroids
This systematic review found no evidence that alternative inhaler
devices are more effective than pressurised metered dose inhalers for
giving inhaled corticosteroids.
Read all Rapid Responses