Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Paul Elliott Small Area Health Statistics Unit (SAHSU),
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, St
Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG
Correspondence and reprint requests to: P Elliott p.elliott{at}ic.ac.uk
Objective:
To investigate the risk of adverse birth
outcomes associated with residence near landfill sites in Great Britain.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Geographical study of risks of adverse birth outcomes in populations living within 2 km of 9565 landfill sites operational at some time between 1982 and 1997 (from a total of 19 196
sites) compared with those living further away.
Setting:
Great Britain.
Subjects:
Over 8.2 million live births, 43 471
stillbirths, and 124 597 congenital anomalies (including terminations).
Main outcome measures:
All congenital anomalies
combined, some specific anomalies, and prevalence of low and very
low birth weight (<2500 g and <1500 g).
Results:
For all anomalies combined, relative
risk of residence near landfill sites (all waste types) was 0.92 (99% confidence interval 0.907 to 0.923) unadjusted, and 1.01 (1.005 to
1.023) adjusted for confounders. Adjusted risks were 1.05 (1.01 to
1.10) for neural tube defects, 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) for cardiovascular defects, 1.07 (1.04 to 1.10) for hypospadias and epispadias (with no
excess of surgical correction), 1.08 (1.01 to 1.15) for abdominal wall
defects, 1.19 (1.05 to 1.34) for surgical correction of gastroschisis and exomphalos, and 1.05 (1.047 to 1.055) and 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05) for low and very low birth weight respectively. There was no excess risk of stillbirth. Findings for special (hazardous) waste sites did
not differ systematically from those for non-special sites. For
some specific anomalies, higher risks were found in the period before opening compared with after opening of a landfill site, especially hospital admissions for abdominal wall defects.
Conclusions:
We found small excess risks of congenital anomalies and low and very low birth weight in populations living near
landfill sites. No causal mechanisms are available to explain these
findings, and alternative explanations include data artefacts and
residual confounding. Further studies are needed to help differentiate between the various possibilities.
Various studies have found excess risks of certain congenital anomalies
and low birth weight near landfill sites
Some 80% of the British population lives within 2 km of known
landfill sites in Great Britain
© BMJ 2001
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+