Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Fiona A Campbell a Pain
Management Centre, Undercroft, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre,
Nottingham NG7 2UH, b Division
d'Anesthésiologie, Département APSIC, Höpitaux Universitaires,
CH-1211 Genève 14, Switzerland, c Pain Research, Nuffield
Department of Anaesthetics, The Churchill, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital,
Oxford OX3 7LJ, d Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Radcliffe Infirmary,
Oxford OX2 6HE
Correspondence to: F A Campbell
fiona.campbell{at}mail.qmcuh-tr.trent.nhs.uk
Objective:
To establish whether cannabis is an
effective and safe treatment option in the management of pain.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources:
Electronic databases Medline, Embase,
Oxford Pain Database, and Cochrane Library; references from identified papers; hand searches.
Study selection:
Trials of cannabis given by any route
of administration (experimental intervention) with any analgesic or
placebo (control intervention) in patients with acute, chronic
non-malignant, or cancer pain. Outcomes examined were pain intensity
scores, pain relief scores, and adverse effects. Validity of trials was
assessed independently with the Oxford score.
Data extraction:
Independent data extraction;
discrepancies resolved by consensus.
Data synthesis:
20 randomised controlled trials were
identified, 11 of which were excluded. Of the 9 included trials (222 patients), 5 trials related to cancer pain, 2 to chronic non-malignant
pain, and 2 to acute postoperative pain. No randomised controlled
trials evaluated cannabis; all tested active substances were
cannabinoids. Oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 5-20 mg, an oral
synthetic nitrogen analogue of THC 1 mg, and intramuscular
levonantradol 1.5-3 mg were about as effective as codeine 50-120 mg,
and oral benzopyranoperidine 2-4 mg was less effective than codeine
60-120 mg and no better than placebo. Adverse effects, most often
psychotropic, were common.
Conclusion:
Cannabinoids are no more effective than
codeine in controlling pain and have depressant effects on the central nervous system that limit their use. Their widespread introduction into
clinical practice for pain management is therefore undesirable. In
acute postoperative pain they should not be used. Before cannabinoids can be considered for treating spasticity and neuropathic pain, further
valid randomised controlled studies are needed.
Three quarters of British doctors surveyed in 1994 wanted cannabis
available on prescription
No studies have been conducted on smoked cannabis
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+