Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Dominik Irnich a Department of Anaesthesiology,
Ludwig-Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany, b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
Ludwig-Maximilians University, c Biometric Center for
Therapeutic Studies, 80336 Munich, Germany, d Department of Orthopaedics, University
of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany, e Reha Klinik Bellikon, 5454 Bellikon,
Switzerland
Correspondence to: D
Irnich Dominik.Irnich{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Objectives:
To compare the efficacy of acupuncture and conventional massage for the treatment of chronic neck pain.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Prospective, randomised, placebo controlled trial.
Setting:
Three outpatient departments in Germany.
Participants:
177 patients aged 18-85 years with
chronic neck pain.
Interventions:
Patients were randomly allocated to
five treatments over three weeks with acupuncture (56), massage (60),
or "sham" laser acupuncture (61).
Main outcome measures:
Primary outcome measure:
maximum pain related to motion (visual analogue scale) irrespective of
direction of movement one week after treatment. Secondary outcome
measures: range of motion (3D ultrasound real time motion analyser),
pain related to movement in six directions (visual analogue scale), pressure pain threshold (pressure algometer), changes of spontaneous pain, motion related pain, global complaints (seven point scale), and
quality of life (SF-36). Assessments were performed before, during, and
one week and three months after treatment. Patients' beliefs in
treatment were assessed.
Results:
One week after five treatments the
acupuncture group showed a significantly greater improvement in motion
related pain compared with massage (difference 24.22 (95% confidence
interval 16.5 to 31.9), P=0.0052) but not compared with sham laser
(17.28 (10.0 to 24.6), P=0.327). Differences between acupuncture and massage or sham laser were greater in the subgroup who had had pain for
longer than five years (n=75) and in patients with myofascial pain
syndrome (n=129). The acupuncture group had the best results in most
secondary outcome measures. There were no differences in patients'
beliefs in treatment.
Conclusions:
Acupuncture is an effective short term
treatment for patients with chronic neck pain, but there is only
limited evidence for long term effects after five treatments.
Acupuncture is a widespread complementary treatment
Compared with sham laser acupuncture and massage, needle acupuncture
has beneficial effects on mobility and pain related to motion in
patients with chronic neck pain
Read all Rapid Responses