Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Alan Hassey a Fisher
Medical Centre, Millfields, Skipton BD23 1EU, b School of Health and Community
Studies, University of Derby, Kingsway, Derby DE22 3HL, c Research School of
Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LN
Correspondence to: A Hassey alan.hassey{at}btinternet.com
Objective:
To develop methods of measuring the
validity and utility of electronic patient records in general practice.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
A survey of the main functional areas of a practice and use of independent criteria to measure the validity of the
practice database.
Setting:
A fully computerised general practice in
Skipton, north Yorkshire.
Subjects:
The records of all registered practice patients.
Main outcome measures:
Validity of the main functional
areas of the practice clinical system. Measures of the completeness,
accuracy, validity, and utility of the morbidity data for 15 clinical
diagnoses using recognised diagnostic standards to confirm diagnoses
and identify further cases. Development of a method and statistical toolkit to validate clinical databases in general practice.
Results:
The practice electronic patient records were valid, complete, and accurate for prescribed items (99.7%),
consultations (98.1%), laboratory tests (100%), hospital episodes
(100%), and childhood immunisations (97%). The morbidity data for 15 clinical diagnoses were complete (mean sensitivity=87%) and accurate
(mean positive predictive value=96%). The presence of the Read codes for the 15 diagnoses was strongly indicative of the true presence of
those conditions (mean likelihood ratio=3917). New interpretations of
descriptive statistics are described that can be used to estimate both
the number of true cases that are unrecorded and quantify the benefits
of validating a clinical database for coded entries.
Conclusion:
This study has developed a method and
toolkit for measuring the validity and utility of general practice
electronic patient records.
Delivering the performance management agenda in the NHS will depend on
the availability of high quality information in general
practice
This study has developed a standard method and toolkit for measuring
the validity and utility of electronic patient record systems
Read all Rapid Responses