Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Paul Little a Primary Medical Care Group, Aldermoor Health
Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, b Nightingale Surgery, Greatwell Drive, Romsey, c Three Swans Surgery,
Rollestone Street, Salisbury, d Health Research
Unit, School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Southampton
University, e Health Care Research Unit, Wessex Institute of Health Research
and Development, Community Clinical Sciences, Health Medicine and
Biological Sciences Division, Southampton University, f Southampton and South West Hants
Health Commission, Southampton, g Mental Health Group, Department of Psychiatry,
Community Clinical Sciences, Health Medicine and Biological Sciences
Division, Southampton University
Correspondence to: P Little
psl3{at}soton.ac.uk
Objective:
To assess the effectiveness of providing
information by post about managing minor illnesses.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Six general practices.
Participants:
Random sample of 4002 patients from the
practice registers.
Intervention:
Patients were randomised to receive one
of three kinds of leaflet or booklet endorsed by their general
practitioner: control (surgery access times), booklet, or summary card.
Main outcome measures:
Attendance with the 42 minor
illnesses listed in the booklet. Perceived usefulness of leaflets or
booklets, confidence in managing illness, and willingness to wait
before seeing the doctor.
Results:
238 (6%) patients did not receive the
intervention as allocated. Of the remaining 3764 patients, 2965 (79%)
had notes available for review after one year. Compared with the
control group, fewer patients attended commonly with the minor
illnesses in the booklet group (
2 consultations a year: odds ratio
0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.99) and the summary card group (0.83; 0.72 to 0.96). Among patients who had attended with respiratory tract infections in the past year there was a reduction in those attending in the booklet group (0.81; 0.62 to 1.07) and summary card
group (0.67; 0.51 to 0.89) compared with the control group. The
incidence of contacts with minor illness fell slightly compared with
the previous year in the booklet (incidence ratio 0.97; 0.84 to 1.13)
and summary card groups (0.93; 0.80 to 1.07). More patients in the
intervention groups felt greater confidence in managing illness
(booklet 32%, card 34%, control 12%, P<0.001), but there was no
difference in willingness to wait score (all groups mean=32, P=0.67).
Conclusion:
Most patients find information about minor illness provided by post useful, and it helps their confidence in
managing illness. Information may reduce the number attending commonly
with minor illness, but the effect on overall contacts is likely to be
modest. These data suggest that posting detailed information booklets
about minor illness to the general population would have a limited effect.
Increasing attendance for minor illness in primary care is a threat to
consultation time and quality of care
Most patients find information about minor illness provided by post
useful, and it helps their confidence in managing illness
Read all Rapid Responses