Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Mark Waterstone a Department of Public Health Medicine, Guy's,
King's College, and St Thomas's Hospitals Schools of Medicine
and Dentistry, Capital House, London SE1 3QD, b Women's Health Directorate, Guy's and
St Thomas's NHS Trust, St Thomas's Hospital, London
SE1 7EH
Correspondence to: C Wolfe charles.wolfe{at}kcl.ac.uk
Objective:
To estimate the incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Development of definitions of severe obstetric morbidity by literature review. Case-control study from a defined delivery population with four randomly selected pregnant women as
controls for every case.
Setting:
All 19 maternity units within the South East Thames region and six neighbouring hospitals caring for pregnant women
from the region between 1 March 1997 and 28 February 1998.
Participants:
48 865 women who delivered during the
time frame.
Results:
There were 588 cases of severe obstetric
morbidity giving an incidence of 12.0/1000 deliveries (95% confidence
interval 11.2 to 13.2). During the study there were five maternal
deaths attributed to conditions studied. Disease specific morbidities per 1000 deliveries were 6.7 (6.0 to 7.5) for severe haemorrhage, 3.9 (3.3 to 4.5) for severe pre-eclampsia, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) for eclampsia,
0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) for HELLP (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low
Platelets) syndrome, 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) for severe sepsis, and 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) for uterine rupture. Age over 34 years, non-white ethnic group,
past or current hypertension, previous postpartum haemorrhage, delivery
by emergency caesarean section, antenatal admission to hospital,
multiple pregnancy, social exclusion, and taking iron or
anti-depressants at antenatal booking were all independently associated
with morbidity after adjustment.
Conclusion:
Severe obstetric morbidity and its
relation to mortality may be more sensitive measures of pregnancy
outcome than mortality alone. Most events are related to obstetric
haemorrhage and severe pre-eclampsia. Caesarean section quadruples the
risk of morbidity. Development and evaluation of ways of predicting and
reducing risk are required with particular emphasis paid on the
management of haemorrhage and pre-eclampsia.
Maternal mortality is used internationally as a measure of the quality
of obstetric intervention, although it is now rare in the developed
world
With clear definitions and population based estimates of some severe
obstetric morbidities this study estimated the overall incidence of
severe obstetric morbidity as 1.2 % of deliveries
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+