Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jane E Ferrie a International Centre for Health and Society,
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London
Medical School, London WC1E 6BT, b Department of Sociology, PO Box 18, 00014 University of
Helsinki, Finland, c Department of Psychiatry, Basic Medical Sciences
Building, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, d Department of Social Medicine, University of
Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol BSS 2PR
Correspondence to:
J Ferrie j.ferrie{at}public-health.ucl.ac.uk
Objectives:
To determine whether employment status
after job loss due to privatisation influences health and use of health services and whether financial strain, psychosocial measures, or health
related behaviours can explain any findings.
Design:
Data collected before and 18 months after privatisation.
Setting:
One department of the civil service that was sold to the private sector.
Participants:
666 employees during baseline screening
in the department to be privatised.
Main outcome measures:
Health and health service
outcomes associated with insecure re-employment, permanent exit from
paid employment, and unemployment after privatisation compared with
outcomes associated with secure re-employment.
Results:
Insecure re-employment and unemployment were associated with relative increases in minor psychiatric morbidity (mean
difference 1.56 (95% confidence intervals interval 1.0 to 2.2) and
1.25 (0.6 to 2.0) respectively) and having four or more consultations
with a general practitioner in the past year (odds ratio 2.04 (1.1 to
3.8) and 2.39 (1.2 to 4.7) respectively). Health outcomes for
respondents permanently out of paid employment closely resembled those
in secure re-employment, except for a substantial relative increase in
longstanding illness (2.25; 1.1 to 4.4). Financial strain and change in
psychosocial measures and health related behaviours accounted for
little of the observed associations. Adjustment for change in minor
psychiatric morbidity attenuated the association between insecure
re-employment or unemployment and general practitioner consultations by
26% and 27%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Insecure re-employment and unemployment
after privatisation result in increases in minor psychiatric morbidity and consultations with a general practitioner, which are possibly due
to the increased minor psychiatric morbidity.