Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Smita Shah a Primary Health Care Education and Research Unit,
Auburn Hospital and Community Health Services, Auburn, NSW 2144, Australia, b Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead,
NSW 2145, Australia, c Department of Public
Health and Community Medicine, Westmead Hospital, d School of Paediatrics,
University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia, e Airway Research Centre, Department
of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
2310, Australia
Correspondence to: S Shah, Department of Public
Health and Community Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia Smita_Shah{at}wsahs.nsw.gov.au
Objective:
To determine the effect of a peer led
programme for asthma education on quality of life and related morbidity in adolescents with asthma.
Design:
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Six high schools in rural Australia.
Participants:
272 students with recent wheeze,
recruited from a cohort of 1515 students from two school years (mean
age 12.5 and 15.5 years); 251 (92.3%) completed the study.
Intervention:
A structured education programme for
peers comprising three steps (the "Triple A Program").
Main outcome measures:
Quality of life, school
absenteeism, asthma attacks, and lung function.
Results:
When adjusted for year and sex, mean total quality of life scores showed significant improvement in the
intervention than control group. Clinically important improvement in
quality of life (>0.5 units) occurred in 25% of students with asthma
in the intervention group compared with 12% in the control group (P=0.01). The number needed to treat was 8 (95% confidence interval 4.5 to 35.7). The effect of the intervention was greatest in students in year 10 and in females. Significant improvements occurred in the
activities domain (41% v 28%) and in the emotions domain
(39% v 19%) in males in the intervention group. School
absenteeism significantly decreased in the intervention group only.
Asthma attacks at school increased in the control group only.
Conclusion:
The triple A programme leads to a
clinically relevant improvement in quality of life and related
morbidity in students with asthma. Wider dissemination of this
programme in schools could play an important part in reducing the
burden of asthma in adolescents.
Read all Rapid Responses