BMJ 2001;322:406-409 ( 17 February )

Primary care

Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review

Simon M Gilbody, MRC fellow in health services research, ^a Allan O House, professor liaison psychiatry, ^b Trevor A Sheldon, head. ^c

^a NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York YO10 5DD, ^b Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds LS2 9LT, ^c Department of Health Studies, University of York

Correspondence to: S M Gilbody Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds LS2 9LT s.m.gilbody{at}leeds.ac.uk

Objectives: To examine the effect of routinely administered psychiatric questionnaires on the recognition, management, and outcome of psychiatric disorders in non-psychiatric settings.
Data sources: Embase, Medline, PsycLIT, Cinahl, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and hand searches of key journals.
Methods: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of the administration and routine feedback of psychiatric screening and outcome questionnaires to clinicians in non-psychiatric settings. Narrative overview of key design features and end points, together with a random effects quantitative synthesis of comparable studies.
Main outcome measures: Recognition of psychiatric disorders after feedback of questionnaire results; interventions for psychiatric disorders; and outcome of psychiatric disorders.
Results: Nine randomised studies were identified that examined the use of common psychiatric instruments in primary care and general hospital settings. Studies compared the effect of the administration of these instruments followed by the feedback of the results to clinicians, with administration with no feedback. Meta-analytic pooling was possible for four of these studies (2457 participants), which measured the effect of feedback on the recognition of depressive disorders. Routine administration and feedback of scores for all patients (irrespective of score) did not increase the overall rate of recognition of mental disorders such as anxiety and depression (relative risk of detection of depression by clinician after feedback 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.09). Two studies showed that routine administration followed by selective feedback for only high scorers increased the rate of recognition of depression (relative risk of detection of depression after feedback 2.64, 1.62 to 4.31). This increased recognition, however, did not translate into an increased rate of intervention. Overall, studies of routine administration of psychiatric measures did not show an effect on patient outcome.
Conclusions: The routine measurement of outcome is a costly exercise. Little evidence shows that it is of benefit in improving psychosocial outcomes of those with psychiatric disorder managed in non-psychiatric settings.

---

© BMJ 2001
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study

B Arroll, F Goodyear-Smith, N Kerse, T Fishman, and J Gunn
BMJ 2005 331: 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Questionnaires for depression and anxiety

Michael Pignone, Bradley N Gaynes, Kathleen N Lohr, C Tracy Orleans, Cynthia Mulrow, James C Coyne, Steven C Palmer, Richard Thompson, and Bruce Arroll
BMJ 2001 323: 167. [Extract] [Full Text]

Challenges to orthodoxy?
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Challenges to orthodoxy?
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Routinely administered questionnaires do not improve care of emotional disorders
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 195: 15-22 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• St John, P. D., Montgomery, P. (2009). Does a single-item measure of depression predict mortality?. cfp 55: e1-e5 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Baas, K. D., Wittkampf, K. A., van Weert, H. C., Lucassen, P., Huyser, J., van den Hoogen, H., van de Lisdonk, E., Bindels, P. E., Bockting, C. L., Ruhe, H. G., Schene, A. H. (2009). Screening for depression in high-risk groups: prospective cohort study in general practice. Br. J. Psychiatry 194: 399-403 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wittkampf, K A, van Zwieten, M, Smits, F T., Schene, A H, Huyser, J, van Weert, H C (2008). Patients' view on screening for depression in general practice. Fam Pract 25: 438-444 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jordan, A., Eccleston, C., Crombez, G. (2008). Parental Functioning in the Context of Adolescent Chronic Pain: A Review of Previously used Measures. J Pediatr Psychol 33: 640-659 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gilbody, S. DPhil, Sheldon, T. DSc, House, A. DM (2008). Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 178: 997-1003 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• PRIEBE, S., McCABE, R., BULLENKAMP, J., HANSSON, L., LAUBER, C., MARTINEZ-LEAL, R., ROSSLER, W., SALIZE, H., SVENSSON, B., TORRES-GONZALES, F., VAN DEN BRINK, R., WIERSMA, D., WRIGHT, D. J. (2007). Structured patient clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 420-426 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Guyatt, G. H., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., Revicki, D. A., Symonds, T. L., Varricchio, C. G., Kotzeva, A., Valderas, J. M., Alonso, J. L., Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group, (2007). Exploration of the Value of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Information From Clinical Research and Into Clinical Practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 1229-1239 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• SLADE, M., McCRONE, P., KUIPERS, E., LEESE, M., CAHILL, S., PARABIAGHI, A., PRIEBE, S., THORNICROFT, G. (2006). Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: Randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 189: 330-336 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rief, W., Martin, A., Rauh, E., Zech, T., Bender, A. (2006). Evaluation of General Practitioners' Training: How to Manage Patients With Unexplained Physical Symptoms. Psychosomatics 47: 304-311 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Unutzer, J., Schoenbaum, M., Druss, B. G., Katon, W. J. (2006). Transforming Mental Health Care at the Interface With General Medicine: Report for the Presidents Commission. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 37-47 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Arroll, B, Goodyear-Smith, F, Kerse, N, Fishman, T, Gunn, J (2005). Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study. BMJ 331: 884- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Christensen, K. S., Toft, T., Frostholm, L., Ornbol, E., Fink, P., Olesen, F. (2005). Screening for common mental disorders: who will benefit? Results from a randomised clinical trial. Fam Pract 22: 428-434 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Zantinge, E. M, Verhaak, P. F., Bensing, J. M (2005). The workload of GPs: patients with psychological and somatic problems compared. Fam Pract 22: 293-297 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rona, R. J., Hyams, K. C., Wessely, S. (2005). Screening for Psychological Illness in Military Personnel. JAMA 293: 1257-1260 [Full text]  
• Boynton, P. M, Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 328: 1312-1315 [Full text]  
• Arroll, B., Khin, N., Kerse, N. (2003). Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study. BMJ 327: 1144-1146 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2003). Mild depression in general practice: time for a rethink?. DTB 41: 60-64 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gunn, J., Southern, D., Chondros, P., Thomson, P., Robertson, K. (2003). Guidelines for assessing postnatal problems: introducing evidence-based guidelines in Australian general practice. Fam Pract 20: 382-389 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R. (2003). Educational and Organizational Interventions to Improve the Management of Depression in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. JAMA 289: 3145-3151 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Plummer, W. P, Brugha, T. S, Fahey, T., Sullivan, F., MacGillivray, S., Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Hegerl, U. (2003). Screening for depression in primary care. BMJ 326: 982-982 [Full text]  
• Gilbody, S M, Whitty, P M, Grimshaw, J M, Thomas, R E (2003). Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 149-155 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wright, E.P., Selby, P.J., Crawford, M., Gillibrand, A., Johnston, C., Perren, T.J., Rush, R., Smith, A., Velikova, G., Watson, K., Gould, A., Cull, A. (2003). Feasibility and Compliance of Automated Measurement of Quality of Life in Oncology Practice. JCO 21: 374-382 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Uchitomi, Y., Mikami, I., Nagai, K., Nishiwaki, Y., Akechi, T., Okamura, H. (2003). Depression and Psychological Distress in Patients During the Year After Curative Resection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO 21: 69-77 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Stark, D., Kiely, M., Smith, A., Velikova, G., House, A., Selby, P. (2002). Anxiety Disorders in Cancer Patients: Their Nature, Associations, and Relation to Quality of Life. JCO 20: 3137-3148 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• MacHale, S. (2002). Managing depression in physical illness. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 8: 297-305 [Full text]  
• Pignone, M. P., Gaynes, B. N., Rushton, J. L., Burchell, C. M., Orleans, C. T., Mulrow, C. D., Lohr, K. N. (2002). Screening for Depression in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 136: 765-776 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gilbody, S. (2002). 4 factors were predictive of extended duration in hospital in acute psychiatric admission. Evid. Based Ment. Health 5: 64-64 [Full text]  
• GILBODY, S. M., HOUSE, A. O., SHELDON, T. A. (2002). Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures: National survey. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 101-103 [Full text]  
• GILBODY, S., WHITTY, P. (2002). Improving the delivery and organisation of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 13-18 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Browne, G. (2001). Review: questionnaire feedback to clinicians improves recognition of psychiatric disorders in high risk patients but not in all patients in non-psychiatric settings. Evid. Based Nurs. 4: 123-123 [Full text]  
• Pignone, M., Gaynes, B. N, Lohr, K. N, Orleans, C T., Mulrow, C., Coyne, J. C, Palmer, S. C, Thompson, R., Arroll, B. (2001). Questionnaires for depression and anxiety. BMJ 323: 167-167 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Additional Pitfalls of Routine Screening

James C Coyne, et al.
bmj.com, 19 Feb 2001 [Full text]

Screening could be worthwhile.

Christopher Gale
bmj.com, 21 Feb 2001 [Full text]

Appropriate Depression Questionnaires May Be Useful in the Correct Clinical Setting

Gareth J Treharne
bmj.com, 27 Feb 2001 [Full text]

Screening for anxiety and depression in a Liver Transplant Clinic

Scott Eaton
bmj.com, 14 Mar 2001 [Full text]

Gilbody et al systematic review incomplete

Michael Pignone
bmj.com, 22 Mar 2001 [Full text]

Brief questions better than screening questionnaires for depression

Bruce Arroll
bmj.com, 22 Mar 2001 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>