Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Danny Dorling a School of Geography, University of
Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, b School of Geographical Sciences,
University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, c Department of City and Regional
Planning, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3WA, d Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol,
Bristol BS8 2PR
Correspondence to: D.Dorling{at}geography.leeds.ac.uk
Objectives:
To compare the extent to which late 20th
century patterns of mortality in London are predicted by contemporary patterns of poverty and by late 19th century patterns of poverty. To
test the hypothesis that the pattern of mortality from causes known to
be related to deprivation in early life can be better predicted by the
distribution of poverty in the late 19th century than by that in the
late 20th century.
Design:
Data from Charles Booth's survey of
inner London in 1896 were digitised and matched to contemporary local government wards. Ward level indices of relative poverty were derived
from Booth's survey and the 1991 UK census of population. All deaths
which took place within the surveyed area between 1991 and 1995 were
identified and assigned to contemporary local government wards.
Standardised mortality ratios for various causes of death were
calculated for each ward for all ages, under age 65, and over age 65. Simple correlation and partial correlation analysis were used to
estimate the contribution of the indices of poverty from 1896 and 1991 in predicting ward level mortality ratios in the early 1990s.
Setting:
Inner London.
Results:
For many causes of death in London, measures of deprivation made around 1896 and 1991 both contributed strongly to
predicting the current spatial distribution. Contemporary mortality from diseases which are known to be related to deprivation in early
life (stomach cancer, stroke, lung cancer) is predicted more strongly
by the distribution of poverty in 1896 than that in 1991. In addition,
all cause mortality among people aged over 65 was slightly more
strongly related to the geography of poverty in the late 19th century
than to its contemporary distribution.
Conclusions:
Contemporary patterns of some
diseases have their roots in the past. The fundamental relation between
spatial patterns of social deprivation and spatial patterns of
mortality is so robust that a century of change in inner London has
failed to disrupt it.
Read all Rapid Responses