Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Susan F Murray Centre for
International Child Health, Institute of Child Health, University
College London, London WC1N 1EH
s.murray{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk
Objectives:
To explore the circumstances and factors
that explain the association between private health insurance cover and
a high rate of caesarean sections in Chile.
Design:
Qualitative analysis of audiotaped in-depth interviews with obstetricians and pregnant women; quantitative analysis
of data from face to face semistructured interview survey conducted
postnatally (with women who had given birth in the previous 24-72 hours), and of a review of medical notes at a public hospital, a
university hospital, and a private clinic.
Setting:
Santiago, Chile.
Participants:
Qualitative arm: 22 obstetricians, 21 pregnant women; quantitative arm: 540 postnatal women.
Main outcome measures:
Rates of caesarean section in
different types of institutions; consultants' views on private
practice; work patterns in private practice; women's reasons for
choosing private care; women's preferences on method of delivery.
Results:
Private health insurance cover requires the primary maternity care provider to be an obstetrician. In the postnatal
survey, women with private obstetricians showed consistently higher
rates of caesarean section (range 57-83%) than those cared for by
midwives or doctors on duty in public or university hospitals (range
27-28%). Only a minority of women receiving private care reported that
they had wanted this method of delivery (range 6-32%). With the
diversification in the healthcare market, most obstetricians now have
demanding peripatetic work schedules. Private maternity patients are a
lucrative source of income. The obstetrician is committed to attend
these private births in person, and the "programming" (or
scheduling) of births is a common time management strategy. The rate of
elective caesarean sections was 30-68% in women with private
obstetricians and 12-14% in women not attended by private obstetricians.
Conclusions:
Policies on healthcare financing can
influence maternity care management and outcomes in unforeseen ways.
The prevailing business ethos in health care encourages such pragmatism among those doctors who do not have a moral objection to non-medical caesarean section.
© BMJ 2000
Read all Rapid Responses