Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
L Davies a Department of Medicine, University Hospital
Aintree, Liverpool L9 7AL, b ACTRITE team, Accident and
Emergency Department, University Hospital Aintree, c Aintree Chest Centre, University
Hospital Aintree
Correspondence to: R M Angus robmangus{at}aol.com
Objectives:
To compare "hospital at home"
and hospital care as an inpatient in acute exacerbations of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease.
Design:
Prospective randomised controlled trial with three months' follow up.
Setting:
University teaching hospital offering
secondary care service to 350 000 patients.
Patients:
Selected patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where hospital admission had been
recommended after medical assessment.
Interventions:
Nurse administered home care was
provided as an alternative to inpatient admission.
Main outcome measures:
Readmission rates at two weeks
and three months, changes in forced expiratory volume in one second
(FEV1) from baseline at these times and mortality.
Results:
583 patients with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease referred for admission were assessed. 192 met the
criteria for home care, and 42 refused to enter the trial. 100 were
randomised to home care and 50 to hospital care. On admission,
FEV1 after use of a bronchodilator was 36.1% (95%
confidence interval 2.4% to 69.8%) predicted in home care and 35.1%
(6.3% to 63.9%) predicted in hospital care. No significant difference
was found in FEV1 after use of a bronchodilator at two
weeks (42.6%, 3.4% to 81.8% versus 42.1%, 5.1% to 79.1%) or three
months (41.5%, 8.2% to 74.8% versus 41.9%, 6.2% to 77.6%) between
the groups. 37% of patients receiving home care and 34% receiving
hospital care were readmitted at three months. No significant
difference was found in mortality between the groups at three months
(9% versus 8%).
Conclusions:
Hospital at home care is a practical
alternative to emergency admission in selected patients with
exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Read all Rapid Responses