BMJ 2000;321:1255-1259 ( 18 November )

Papers

Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study

Agustin Conde-Agudelo, perinatal researcher,  José M Belizán, director. 

Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development (CLAP), Division of Health Promotion and Protection, Pan American Health Organisation, World Health Organisation, Montevideo, Uruguay

Correspondence to: A Conde-Agudelo condeagu{at}uniweb.net.co

Objective: To study the impact of interpregnancy interval on maternal morbidity and mortality.
Design: Retrospective cross sectional study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Setting: Latin America and the Caribbean, 1985-97.
Participants: 456 889 parous women delivering singleton infants.
Main outcome measures: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of the effects of short and long interpregnancy intervals on maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, third trimester bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum haemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, and anaemia.
Results: Short (<6 months) and long (>59 months) interpregnancy intervals were observed for 2.8% and 19.5% of women, respectively. After adjustment for major confounding factors, compared with those conceiving at 18 to 23 months after a previous birth, women with interpregnancy intervals of 5 months or less had higher risks for maternal death (odds ratio 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.38), third trimester bleeding (1.73; 1.42 to 2.24), premature rupture of membranes (1.72; 1.53 to 1.93), puerperal endometritis (1.33; 1.22 to 1.45), and anaemia (1.30; 1.18 to 1.43). Compared with women with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, women with interpregnancy intervals longer than 59 months had significantly increased risks of pre-eclampsia (1.83; 1.72 to 1.94) and eclampsia (1.80; 1.38 to 2.32).
Conclusions: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

---

© BMJ 2000
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Short and long gaps between pregnancies can harm women
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text]

Website of the week: The fertile window

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2000 321: 1296. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mikolajczyk, R. T., Zhang, J., Ford, J., Grewal, J. (2008). Effects of Interpregnancy Interval on Blood Pressure in Consecutive Pregnancies. Am J Epidemiol 168: 422-426 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• de Vera, N. Z. (2007). Birth Spacing Perceptions of Rural Filipinos. J Transcult Nurs 18: 238-246 [Abstract]  
• McFarlane, J. (2007). Pregnancy Following Partner Rape: What We Know and What We Need To Know. Trauma Violence Abuse 8: 127-134 [Abstract]  
• Penn, D. J., Smith, K. R. (2007). Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 553-558 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Royce, R. A. (2006). Birth spacing--the long and short of it.. JAMA 295: 1837-1838 [Full text]  
• Pallitto, C. C., Campbell, J. C., O'Campo, P. (2005). Is Intimate Partner Violence Associated with Unintended Pregnancy? A Review of the Literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 6: 217-235 [Abstract]  
• Hsieh, T.-T., Chen, S.-F., Shau, W.-Y., Hsieh, C.-C., Hsu, J.-J., Hung, T.-H. (2005). The Impact of Interpregnancy Interval and Previous Preterm Birth on the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth. Reproductive Sciences 12: 202-207 [Abstract]  
• Duckitt, K., Harrington, D. (2005). Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 330: 565- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• King, J. C. (2003). The Risk of Maternal Nutritional Depletion and Poor Outcomes Increases in Early or Closely Spaced Pregnancies. J. Nutr. 133: 1732S-1736 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Skjaerven, R., Wilcox, A. J., Lie, R. T. (2002). The Interval between Pregnancies and the Risk of Preeclampsia. NEJM 346: 33-38 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Other Important Considerations in Interpregnancy Interval

Eithne Linnane
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2000 [Full text]

Re: Other Important Considerations in Interpregnancy Interval

Agustin Conde-Agudelo, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Dec 2000 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>