Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
A Messori a Laboratorio SIFO di Farmacoeconomia,
Centro Informazione Farmaci, Servizio Farmaceutico, Azienda Ospedaliera
Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy, b Unita' di Terapia Intensiva
Respiratoria, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
Correspondence to: A Messori md3439{at}mclink.it
Objectives:
To determine the effectiveness of
ranitidine and sucralfate in the prevention of stress ulcer in critical
patients and to assess if these treatments affect the risk of
nosocomial pneumonia.
Design:
Published studies retrieved through
Medline and other databases. Five meta-analyses evaluated effectiveness in terms of bleeding rates (A: ranitidine v placebo; B:
sucralfate v placebo) and infectious complications in terms
of incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (C: ranitidine v
placebo; D: sucralfate v placebo; E: ranitidine
v sucralfate). Trial quality was determined with an
empirical ad hoc procedure.
Main outcome measures:
Rates of clinically important
gastrointestinal bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia (compared between
the two study arms and expressed with odds ratios specific for
individual studies and meta-analytic summary odds ratios).
Results:
Meta-analysis A (five studies) comprised 398 patients; meta-analysis C (three studies) comprised 311 patients; meta-analysis D (two studies) comprised 226 patients: and meta-analysis E (eight studies) comprised 1825 patients. Meta-analysis B was not
carried out as the literature search selected only one clinical trial.
In meta-analysis A ranitidine was found to have the same effectiveness
as placebo (odds ratio of bleeding 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 1.70, P=0.46). In placebo controlled studies (meta-analyses C and D)
ranitidine and sucralfate had no influence on the incidence of
nosocomial pneumonia. In comparison with sucralfate, ranitidine
significantly increased the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia
(meta-analysis E: 1.35, 1.07 to 1.70, P=0.012). The mean quality score
in the four analyses (on a 0 to 10 scale) ranged from 5.6 in
meta-analysis E to 6.6 in meta-analysis A.
Conclusions:
Ranitidine is ineffective in the
prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients in intensive care
and might increase the risk of pneumonia. Studies on sucralfate do not
provide conclusive results. These findings are based on small numbers
of patients, and firm conclusions cannot presently be proposed.
Read all Rapid Responses