Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Richard Harrington a Department of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester
M27 4HA, b Centre for
Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
Correspondence to: R Harrington,
University Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Royal
Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, Manchester M27 4HA
R.C.Harrington{at}man.ac.uk
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that a community
based intervention by secondary child and adolescent mental health
services would be significantly more effective and less costly than a
hospital based intervention.
Design:
Open study with two randomised parallel groups.
Setting:
Two health districts in the north of England.
Participants:
Parents of 3 to 10 year old children
with behavioural disorder who had been referred to child and adolescent mental health services.
Intervention:
Parental education groups.
Main outcome measures:
Parents' and teachers'
reports of the child's behaviour, parental depression, parental
criticism of the child, impact of the child's behaviour on the family.
Results:
141 subjects were randomised to community (n=72) or hospital (n=69) treatment. Primary outcome data were obtained
on 115 (82%) cases a year later. Intention to treat analyses showed no
significant differences between the community and hospital based groups
on any of the outcome measures, or on costs. Parental depression was
common and predicted the child's outcome.
Conclusions:
Location of child mental health services
may be less important than the range of services that they provide, which should include effective treatment for parents' mental health problems.
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care