BMJ 2000;321:727-729 ( 23 September )

Papers

National census of availability of neonatal intensive care

Jill Parmanum, research nurse, ^a David Field, professor of neonatal medicine, ^a Janet Rennie, consultant neonatologist, ^b Philip Steer, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology, ^c on behalf of the British Association for Perinatal Medicine.

^a Department of Child Health, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, ^b Kings College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, ^c Imperial College School of Medicine, London W2 1PG

Correspondence to: D Field dfield{at}lri.org.uk

Objective: To determine whether availability of neonatal intensive care cots is a problem in any or all parts of the United Kingdom.
Design: Three month census from 1 April to 30 June 1999 comprising simple data sheets on transfers out of tertiary units.
Setting: The 37 largest high risk perinatal centres in the United Kingdom.
Participants: One obstetric specialist and one neonatal specialist in each centre.
Main outcome measures: Suboptimal care resulting directly from pressure on servicethat is, transfers out of tertiary units (either in utero or after delivery) because the unit was "full" and not because the hospital was incapable of providing the care needed.
Results: All units provided data. The number of intensive care cots in each unit was between five and 16. During the three months 309 transfers occurred (equivalent to 1236 per year), of which 264 were in utero and 45 postnatal. Sixty five in utero transfers involved multiple births, hence the census related to 382 babies (1528 per year). There was considerable regional variation. The reason for transfer in most cases was "lack of neonatal beds".
Conclusions: Currently most major perinatal centres in the United Kingdom are regularly unable to meet in-house demand; this has implications for the service as a whole. The NHS has set no standards to help health authorities and primary care groups develop services relating to this specialty; such a step may well be an appropriate lever for change.

---

© BMJ 2000
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Census of availability of neonatal intensive care should have used different denominator

M Hall, R Thwaites, and Melanie J Gompels
BMJ 2001 322: 675. [Extract] [Full Text]

Distinguishing the signal in the noise
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Distinguishing the signal in the noise
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

UK perinatal centres often cannot meet demand
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cusack, J. M, Field, D. J, Manktelow, B. N (2007). Impact of service changes on neonatal transfer patterns over 10 years. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F181-F184 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kempley, S T, Baki, Y, Hayter, G, Ratnavel, N, Cavazzoni, E, Reyes, T, on behalf of the Thames Regional Perinatal Group a, (2007). Effect of a centralised transfer service on characteristics of inter-hospital neonatal transfers. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F185-F188 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• StC Hamilton, K. E, Redshaw, M. E, Tarnow-Mordi, W. (2007). Nurse staffing in relation to risk-adjusted mortality in neonatal care. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F99-F103 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Marlow, N., Bryan Gill, A (2007). Establishing neonatal networks: the reality. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F137-F142 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bramwell, R, Weindling, M, for the FVWR Research Team, (2005). Families' views on ward rounds in neonatal units. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F429-F431 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kempley, S T, Sinha, A K, on behalf of the Thames Regional Perinatal Group, (2004). Census of neonatal transfers in London and the South East of England. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F521-F526 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cornette, L (2004). Contemporary neonatal transport: problems and solutions. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F212-F214 [Full text]  
• Fenton, A C, Leslie, A, Skeoch, C H (2004). Optimising neonatal transfer. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F215-F219 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gill, A B, Bottomley, L, Chatfield, S, Wood, C (2004). Perinatal transport: problems in neonatal intensive care capacity. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F220-F223 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jain, A, Fleming, P (2004). Project 27/28. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F14-F16 [Full text]  
• Hall, M, Thwaites, R, Gompels, M. J (2001). Census of availability of neonatal intensive care should have used different denominator. BMJ 322: 675b-675 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

waiting list for neonatal intensive care

Richard Nicholl
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2000 [Full text]

Perinatal Crisis-care: demands on supply

Rani Pal
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2000 [Full text]

Resourcing neonatal intensive care

Alan C Fenton
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2000 [Full text]

National census of availability of neonatal intensive care

P Toozs-Hobson
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2000 [Full text]

National census of availability of neonatal intensive care

Michael Hall
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2000 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>