Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Martin J Jarvis a ICRF
Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,
University College London, London WC1E 6BT, b Office for
National Statistics, Drummond Gate, London SW1V 2QQ, c Medical Toxicology Unit, New Cross Hospital, London
SE14 5ER, d Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's
Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
Correspondence to:
M J Jarvis martin.jarvis{at}ucl.ac.uk
Objective:
To determine whether children's
exposure to passive smoking has changed since the late 1980s.
Design:
Cross sectional surveys of nationally
representative samples of secondary school children carried out between
1988 and 1998 by Office for National Statistics.
Setting:
England.
Subjects:
Secondary school children aged 11-15.
Main outcome measures:
Salivary cotinine
concentrations in non-smoking children.
Results:
Cotinine concentrations in all non-smoking children almost halved between 1988 and 1998, from a geometric mean of
0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.11) ng/ml in 1988 to 0.52 (0.43 to 0.62) ng/ml in 1998. This reduction was largely due to
reductions in exposure in children from non-smoking households and to
decreases in the percentage of parents who smoked. Children living with
mothers or fathers who smoked experienced little reduction in exposure.
Conclusions:
Exposure to passive smoking among
children in England has approximately halved since the late 1980s. This reduction is partly explained by the fall in the percentage of both
mothers and fathers who smoke and is also likely to reflect reductions
of smoking in public places. However, there is only limited evidence
that children from smoking households have experienced a reduction in
exposure through parents' avoidance of smoking in their presence.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+