Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Christine A Barry a Department of General Practice and Primary Care,
Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, King's
College, London SE11 6SP, b Department of General Practice, University
College, Cork, Republic of Ireland, c School of Pharmacy, University of London,
London WC1N 1AX
Correspondence to: C A Barry, Centre for the Study of Health,
Sickness, and Disablement, Department of Human Sciences, Brunel
University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH christine.barry{at}brunel.ac.uk
Objective:
To investigate patients' agendas before
consultation and to assess which aspects of agendas are voiced in the
consultation and the effects of unvoiced agendas on outcomes.
Design:
Qualitative study.
Setting:
20 general practices in south east England and the West Midlands.
Participants:
35 patients consulting 20 general
practitioners in appointment and emergency surgeries.
Results:
Patients' agendas are complex and
multifarious. Only four of 35 patients voiced all their agendas in
consultation. Agenda items most commonly voiced were symptoms and
requests for diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common unvoiced
agenda items were: worries about possible diagnosis and what the future
holds; patients' ideas about what is wrong; side effects; not wanting a prescription; and information relating to social context. Agenda items that were not raised in the consultation often led to specific problem outcomes (for example, major misunderstandings), unwanted prescriptions, non-use of prescriptions, and non-adherence to treatment. In all of the 14 consultations with problem outcomes at
least one of the problems was related to an unvoiced agenda item.
Conclusion:
Patients have many needs and when these
are not voiced they can not be addressed. Some of the poor outcomes in
the case studies were related to unvoiced agenda items. This suggests
that when patients and their needs are more fully articulated in the
consultation better health care may be effected. Steps should be taken
in both daily clinical practice and research to encourage the voicing
of patients' agendas.
Read all Rapid Responses