Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
J G Williams a School of Postgraduate Studies in Medical and
Health Care, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, b Department
of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York,
Heslington, York YO10 5DD, c Business
School, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF37 1DL
Correspondence to: J G Williams
john.williams{at}pgms.wales.nhs.uk
Objective:
To evaluate whether follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is better through open access than by
routine booked appointments.
Design:
Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Two district general hospitals in Swansea and
Neath, Wales.
Participants:
180 adults (78 with Crohn's disease, 77 ulcerative or indeterminate colitis, 25 ulcerative or idiopathic
proctitis) recruited from outpatient clinics during October 1995 to
November 1996.
Intervention:
Open access follow up according to
patient need.
Main outcome measures:
Generic (SF-36) and disease
specific (UK inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire UKIBDQ) quality
of life, number of primary and secondary care contacts, total resource
use, and views of patients and general practitioners.
Results:
There were no differences in generic or
disease specific quality of life. Open access patients had fewer day
visits (0.21 v 0.42, P<0.05) and fewer outpatient
visits ( 4.12 v 4.64, P<0.01), but some patients had
difficulty obtaining an urgent appointment. There were no significant
differences in specific investigations undertaken, inpatient days,
general practitioner surgery or home visits, drugs prescribed, or total
patient borne costs. Mean total cost in secondary care was lower for
open access patients (P<0.05), but when primary care and patient borne
costs were added there were no significant differences in total costs to the NHS or to society. General practitioners and patients preferred open access.
Conclusions:
Open access follow up delivers the same
quality of care as routine outpatient care and is preferred by patients and general practitioners. It uses fewer resources in secondary care
but total resource use is similar. Better methods of ensuring urgent
access to outpatient clinics are needed.
Read all Rapid Responses