Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jenny L Donovan a Department of
Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, b Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath BA1
1RL
Correspondence to: J L Donovan
jenny.donovan{at}bris.ac.uk
Objectives:
To examine commonly used methods of
reassurance by clinicians and explore their effect on patients.
Design:
Qualitative study of tape recordings of
in-depth, semistructured interviews with patients before and after
consultation and of their consultations with doctors.
Setting:
NHS specialist rheumatology clinics in two large British cities.
Participants:
35 patients selected by consultant
rheumatologists from general practitioner referral letters (28 women, 7 men; 24 with inflammatory arthropathies, 11 other rheumatological complaints).
Main outcome measures:
Patients' perceptions of reassurance.
Results:
Reassurance was an important part of
consultations, whether the diagnosis was clear or uncertain. Clinicians
tried to reduce anxiety by emphasising the mildness, early stage, or non-seriousness of the disorder and the likelihood that patients would
recover. Patients interpreted reassurance in the context of their own
views and perceptions. Doctors' emphasis on the mildness or earliness
of the condition raised the spectre of future pain and disability
rather than providing reassurance. Patients who felt that their
problems were properly acknowledged felt more reassured.
Conclusions:
Typical patterns of reassurance were not
successful because of the differences in perspective of patients and
doctors. A key to successful reassurance seemed to be the doctor's
ability to acknowledge patients' perspectives of their difficulties.
Read all Rapid Responses