BMJ 2000;320:279-282 ( 29 January )

Papers

Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial

Editorial by Naftalin and Habibu

Christian Kremer, research registrarSean Duffy, senior lecturerMichelle Moroney, consultant

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF

Correspondence to: S Duffy medsrd{at}gps.leeds.ac.uk

Objective: To compare outpatient hysteroscopy with day case hysteroscopy in terms of patient satisfaction and acceptability.
Setting: Gynaecology clinic of a teaching hospital.
Participants: 100 women.
Design and interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to outpatient hysteroscopy or day case hysteroscopy provided they had no preference for either procedure.
Main outcome measures: Satisfaction rate, requirements for postoperative analgesia, speed of recovery, time away from home, and time off work.
Results: The outpatient group recovered preoperative fitness more quickly than the day case group (2 days (range 1-2.7) versus 3 days (2-4), P<0.05). After the procedure, the outpatient group were also fully mobile more quickly than the day case group (0 minutes (0-5) versus 105 minutes (80-120), P<0.001). Requirements for postoperative analgesia were similar in both groups. Overall, 78% of patients considered that the pain from outpatient hysteroscopy was less than that usually experienced during menstruation. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (83.6% in the outpatient group versus 77.0% in the day case group).
Conclusions: Outpatient hysteroscopy and day case hysteroscopy were equally acceptable to patients. Patients recovered significantly more quickly from outpatient hysteroscopy than from day case hysteroscopy.


Key messages

  • Patients' satisfaction rates with outpatient hysteroscopy and day case hysteroscopy were similar

  • The outpatient group recovered preoperative fitness more quickly than the day case group

  • Requirements for postoperative analgesia were similar in both groups

  • 78% of patients considered that the pain from outpatient hysteroscopy was less than that usually experienced during menstruation

  • Postmenopausal women may benefit less from outpatient hysteroscopy than premenopausal women





© BMJ 2000

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy
J C R Hardwick, Sean Duffy, and Richard Baker
BMJ 2001 322: 47. [Extract] [Full Text]

Patients are equally satisfied with outpatient and day case hysteroscopy
BMJ 2000 320: 0. [Full Text]

Keeping patients out of hospital
N J Naftalin and M A Habiba
BMJ 2000 320: 262-263. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bosteels, J., Weyers, S., Puttemans, P., Panayotidis, C., Van Herendael, B., Gomel, V., Mol, B. W.J., Mathieu, C., D'Hooghe, T. (2009). The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 0: dmp033v1-dmp033 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Guida, M., Di Spiezi Sardo, A.o, Acunzo, G., Sparice, S., Bramante, S., Piccoli, R., Bifulco, G., Cirillo, D., Pellicano, M., Nappi, C. (2006). Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21: 3253-3257 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Duffy, S., Jackson, T.L., Lansdown, M., Philips, K., Wells, M., Pollard, S., Clack, G., Coibion, M., Bianco, A.R., on behalf of the ATAC Trialists' Group, (2005). The ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial: baseline endometrial sub-protocol data on the effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 20: 294-301 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campo, R., Molinas, C. R., Rombauts, L., Mestdagh, G., Lauwers, M., Braekmans, P., Brosens, I., Van Belle, Y., Gordts, S. (2005). Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 20: 258-263 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gordts, S., Campo, R., Puttemans, P., Verhoeven, H., Gianaroli, L., Brosens, J., Brosens, I. (2002). Investigation of the infertile couple : A one-stop outpatient endoscopy-based approach. Hum Reprod 17: 1684-1687 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hardwick, J C R, Duffy, S., Baker, R. (2001). Outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy. BMJ 322: 47-47 [Full text]  
  • Naftalin, N J, Habiba, M A (2000). Keeping patients out of hospital. BMJ 320: 262-263 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

What is patient satisfaction?
Richard Baker
bmj.com, 1 Feb 2000 [Full text]
Difficulties in comparing groups
J C R Hardwick
bmj.com, 4 Feb 2000 [Full text]
Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy : type of GA may have influenced the results
Sadik K Kodakat
bmj.com, 4 Feb 2000 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ