Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Christian Kremer Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF
Correspondence to: S Duffy medsrd{at}gps.leeds.ac.uk
Objective:
To compare outpatient hysteroscopy with day case hysteroscopy in terms of patient satisfaction and acceptability.
Setting:
Gynaecology clinic of a teaching hospital.
Participants:
100 women.
Design and interventions:
Patients were randomly
allocated to outpatient hysteroscopy or day case hysteroscopy provided
they had no preference for either procedure.
Main outcome measures:
Satisfaction rate, requirements
for postoperative analgesia, speed of recovery, time away from home,
and time off work.
Results:
The outpatient group recovered preoperative fitness more quickly than the day case group (2 days (range 1-2.7) versus 3 days (2-4), P<0.05). After the procedure, the outpatient group were also fully mobile more quickly than the day case group (0 minutes (0-5) versus 105 minutes (80-120), P<0.001). Requirements for
postoperative analgesia were similar in both groups. Overall, 78% of
patients considered that the pain from outpatient hysteroscopy was less
than that usually experienced during menstruation. Patient satisfaction
was similar in both groups (83.6% in the outpatient group versus
77.0% in the day case group).
Conclusions:
Outpatient hysteroscopy and day case
hysteroscopy were equally acceptable to patients. Patients recovered
significantly more quickly from outpatient hysteroscopy than from day
case hysteroscopy.
Key messages
© BMJ 2000
Read all Rapid Responses