BMJ 1999;319:1603-1605 ( 18 December )

Papers

Babes and boobs? Analysis of JAMA cover art

Jocalyn P Clark

Correspondence to: J P Clark, Centre for Research in Women's Health, Toronto, Canada M5G 1N8 j.clark{at}utoronto.ca

Objective: To determine the representation of the sexes in JAMA cover art.
Design: Review of 50 consecutive issues.
Setting: JAMA, March 1997-March 1998.
Main outcome measures: Numbers and nature of covers portraying men and women.
Results: Of the 50 covers, 34 depicted humans. 15 depicted women, 13 men, and 6 were of mixed or indeterminate sex. 11 pictures of women included a child and five included nudity. One cover showed a man with a child (not as a father) and none depicted nudity. Men were depicted exclusively in authoritative roles.
Conclusions: Much of the cover art gives strong messages about sexual stereotypes that are inappropriate in modern society. JAMA should consider reviewing its policy for choosing cover art.


© BMJ 1999

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

JAMA covers reflect inappropriate stereotypes of women
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gladstone, I. M, Katz, V. L (2002). A tale of two citations: counting on numeracy in the digital divide. BMJ 325: 1452-1453 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Kudos to BMJ
Marjorie Shuer
bmj.com, 19 Dec 1999 [Full text]
A meagre survey
Wilfred N Arnold
bmj.com, 21 Dec 1999 [Full text]
Study is tendentious
David H Bevan
bmj.com, 23 Dec 1999 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ