Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
B S P Hellemons a Department of General Practice, University of
Maastricht, P O Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands, b Department of Neurology,
University of Maastricht, c Department of Cardiology, University of Maastricht, d Department of Methodology and
Statistics, University of Maastricht
Correspondence to: B S
P Hellemons-Boode Bep.Hellemons{at}HAG.Unimaas.NL
Objective:
To investigate the effectiveness of aspirin and coumarin in preventing thromboembolism in patients with
non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation in general practice.
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Participants:
729 patients aged
60 years with
atrial fibrillation, recruited in general practice, who had no
established indication for coumarin. Mean age was 75 years and mean
follow up 2.7 years.
Setting:
Primary care in the Netherlands.
Interventions:
Patients eligible for standard
intensity coumarin (international normalised ratio 2.5-3.5) were
randomly assigned to standard anticoagulation, very low intensity
coumarin (international normalised ratio 1.1-1.6), or aspirin (150 mg/day) (stratum 1). Patients ineligible for standard anticoagulation
were randomly assigned to low anticoagulation or aspirin (stratum 2).
Main outcome measures:
Stroke, systemic embolism,
major haemorrhage, and vascular death.
Results:
108 primary events occurred (annual
event rate 5.5%), including 13 major haemorrhages (0.7% a year). The hazard ratio was 0.91 (0.61 to 1.36) for low anticoagulation versus aspirin and 0.78 (0.34 to 1.81) for standard anticoagulation versus aspirin. Non-vascular death was less common in the low anticoagulation group than in the aspirin group (0.41, 0.20 to 0.82). There was no
significant difference between the treatment groups in bleeding incidence. High systolic and low diastolic blood pressure and age were
independent prognostic factors.
Conclusion:
In a general practice population (without established indications for coumarin) neither low nor standard intensity anticoagulation is better than aspirin in preventing primary
outcome events. Aspirin may therefore be the first choice in patients
with atrial fibrillation in general practice.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses