BMJ 1999;319:731-734 ( 18 September )

Papers

Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review

Annette M O'Connor, professora Alaa Rostom, gastroenterologista Valerie Fiset, clinical nurse specialistb Jacqueline Tetroe, research associatea Vikki Entwistle, senior research fellowc Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, professord Margaret Holmes-Rovner, professore Michael Barry, chief, general medicine unitf Jean Jones, consumer health advocateg

a University of Ottawa School of Nursing and Faculty of Medicine, Loeb Health Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9, b Sisters of Charity of Ottawa Health Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, c Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, d University of Toronto, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, North York, Ontario, Canada, e Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA, f General Medicine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, g Dundas, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to: A O'Connor aoconnor{at}LRI.CA

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of randomised trials of patient decision aids in improving decision making and outcomes.
Design: We included randomised trials of interventions providing structured, detailed, and specific information on treatment or screening options and outcomes to aid decision making. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data on several evaluation criteria. Results were pooled by using weighted mean differences and relative risks.
Results: 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the controls, decision aids produced higher knowledge scores (weighted mean difference=19/100, 95% confidence interval 14 to 25); lower decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference=-0.3/5, -0.4 to -0.1); more active patient participation in decision making (relative risk = 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 4); and no differences in anxiety, satisfaction with decisions (weighted mean difference=0.6/100, -3 to 4), or satisfaction with the decision making process (2/100,-3 to 7). Decision aids had a variable effect on decisions. When complex decision aids were compared with simpler versions, they were better at reducing decisional conflict, improved knowledge marginally, but did not affect satisfaction.
Conclusions: Decision aids improve knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, and stimulate patients to be more active in decision making without increasing their anxiety. Decision aids have little effect on satisfaction and a variable effect on decisions. The effects on outcomes of decisions (persistence with choice, quality of life) remain uncertain.



© BMJ 1999

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Making decisions about mammography
Paul Taylor
BMJ 2005 330: 915-916. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Decision aids do improve patients' decision making
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text]

Paternalism or partnership?
Angela Coulter
BMJ 1999 319: 719-720. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nair, V., Strecher, V., Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P., Resnicow, K., Murphy, S., Little, R., Chakraborty, B., Zhang, A. (2008). Screening Experiments and the Use of Fractional Factorial Designs in Behavioral Intervention Research. Am. J. Public Health 98: 1354-1359 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Krahn, M., Naglie, G. (2008). The Next Step in Guideline Development: Incorporating Patient Preferences. JAMA 300: 436-438 [Full text]  
  • Fowler, F. J. Jr, Gallagher, P. M., Anthony, D. L., Larsen, K., Skinner, J. S. (2008). Relationship Between Regional Per Capita Medicare Expenditures and Patient Perceptions of Quality of Care. JAMA 299: 2406-2412 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mathieu, E., Barratt, A., Davey, H. M., McGeechan, K., Howard, K., Houssami, N. (2007). Informed Choice in Mammography Screening: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for 70-Year-Old Women. Arch Intern Med 167: 2039-2046 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rennie, C. A, Hannan, S., Maycock, N., Kang, C. (2007). Age-related macular degeneration: what do patients find on the internet?. JRSM 100: 473-477 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Col, N. F., Ngo, L., Fortin, J. M., Goldberg, R. J., O'Connor, A. M. (2007). Can Computerized Decision Support Help Patients Make Complex Treatment Decisions? A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Individualized Menopause Decision Aid. Med Decis Making 27: 585-598 [Abstract]  
  • O'Connor, A. M., Stacey, D., Barry, M. J., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., Entwistle, V., Fiset, V., Holmes-Rovner, M., Khangura, S., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Rovner, D. R. (2007). Do Patient Decision Aids Meet Effectiveness Criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 27: 554-574 [Abstract]  
  • McCaffery, K., Irwig, L., Bossuyt, P. (2007). Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical Decision Making: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision. Med Decis Making 27: 619-625 [Abstract]  
  • Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K. J., Fagerlin, A., Stefanek, M., Ubel, P. A. (2007). Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity. Med Decis Making 27: 609-618 [Abstract]  
  • Corser, W., Holmes-Rovner, M., Lein, C., Gossain, V. (2007). A Shared Decision-Making Primary Care Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes. The Diabetes Educator 33: 700-708 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cox, E. D., Smith, M. A., Brown, R. L. (2007). Evaluating Deliberation in Pediatric Primary Care. Pediatrics 120: e68-e77 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Juraskova, I., Butow, P., Lopez, A.-L., Seccombe, M., Boyle, F., McCarthy, N., Forbes, J. F. (2007). Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: Successful Piloting of a Decision Aid. JCO 25: 1443-1444 [Full text]  
  • Gardner, D. M., MacKinnon, N., Langille, D. B., Andreou, P. (2007). A Comparison of Factors Used by Physicians and Patients in the Selection of Antidepressant Agents. Psychiatr. Serv. 58: 34-40 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Deegan, P. E., Drake, R. E. (2006). Shared Decision Making and Medication Management in the Recovery Process. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 1636-1639 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van Tol-Geerdink, J. J., Stalmeier, P. F.M., van Lin, E. N.J.T., Schimmel, E. C., Huizenga, H., van Daal, W. A.J., Leer, J.-W. (2006). Do Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Really Want More Aggressive Treatment?. JCO 24: 4581-4586 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thind, A., Maly, R. (2006). The Surgeon-Patient Interaction in Older Women With Breast Cancer: What Are the Determinants of a Helpful Discussion?. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 13: 788-793 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Iconomou, G., Viha, A., Koutras, A., Koukourikou, I., Mega, V., Makatsoris, T., Onyenadum, A., Assimakopoulos, K., Vagenakis, A. G., Kalofonos, H. P. (2006). Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 17: 515-520 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Armstrong, K., Weber, B., Ubel, P. A., Peters, N., Holmes, J., Schwartz, J. S. (2005). Individualized Survival Curves Improve Satisfaction With Cancer Risk Management Decisions in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations. JCO 23: 9319-9328 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bowling, A., Rowe, G. (2005). "You decide doctor". What do patient preference arms in clinical trials really mean?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 914-915 [Full text]  
  • Man-Son-Hing, M., Gage, B. F., Montgomery, A. A., Howitt, A., Thomson, R., Devereaux, P. J., Protheroe, J., Fahey, T., Armstrong, D., Laupacis, A. (2005). Preference-Based Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Clinical Decision Making. Med Decis Making 25: 548-559 [Abstract]  
  • Woolf, S. H., Chan, E. C.Y., Harris, R., Sheridan, S. L., Braddock, C. H. III, Kaplan, R. M., Krist, A., O'Connor, A. M., Tunis, S. (2005). Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making. ANN INTERN MED 143: 293-300 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Peele, P. B., Siminoff, L. A., Xu, Y., Ravdin, P. M. (2005). Decreased Use of Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Aid with Individualized Risk Information. Med Decis Making 25: 301-307 [Abstract]  
  • Taylor, P. (2005). Making decisions about mammography. BMJ 330: 915-916 [Full text]  
  • Jepson, R G, Hewison, J, Thompson, A G H, Weller, D (2005). How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening. J. Med. Ethics 31: 192-196 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Heesen, C., Kasper, J., Segal, J., Kopke, S., Muhlhauser, I. (2004). Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 10: 643-650 [Abstract]  
  • Rovner, D. R., Wills, C. E., Bonham, V., Williams, G., Lillie, J., Kelly-Blake, K., Williams, M. V., Holmes-Rovner, M. (2004). Decision Aids for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Applicability across Race and Education. Med Decis Making 24: 359-366 [Abstract]  
  • Elstein, A. S., Fryback, D. G., Weinstein, M. C., Pauker, S. G., Holmes-Rovner, M., Young, M. J., Barry, M. J., Eckman, M. H., Hunink, M. G. M., Tsevat, J., Wong, J. B. (2004). Presidential Reflections on the 25th Anniversary of the Society for Medical Decision Making. Med Decis Making 24: 408-420  
  • Majumdar, S. R., McAlister, F. A., Furberg, C. D. (2004). From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1738-1742 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fagerlin, A., Rovner, D., Stableford, S., Jentoft, C., Wei, J. T., Holmes-Rovner, M. (2004). Patient Education Materials about the Treatment of Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. ANN INTERN MED 140: 721-728 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Leighl, N. B., Butow, P. N., Tattersall, M. H.N. (2004). Treatment Decision Aids in Advanced Cancer: When the Goal Is Not Cure and the Answer Is Not Clear. JCO 22: 1759-1762 [Full text]  
  • Dent, J, Armstrong, D, Delaney, B, Moayyedi, P, Talley, N J, Vakil, N (2004). Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs. Gut 53: iv1-iv24 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ruland, C. M., White, T., Stevens, M., Fanciullo, G., Khilani, S. M. (2003). Effects of a Computerized System to Support Shared Decision Making in Symptom Management of Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10: 573-579 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Britten, N. (2003). "Doing prescribing": how doctors can be more effective. BMJ 327: 864-867 [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A., Unigwe, S., Elwyn, G., Hood, K. (2003). Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review. BMJ 327: 703-709 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Adab, P, Marshall, T, Rouse, A, Randhawa, B, Sangha, H, Bhangoo, N (2003). Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 589-593 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kravitz, R. L., Bell, R. A., Azari, R., Kelly-Reif, S., Krupat, E., Thom, D. H. (2003). Direct Observation of Requests for Clinical Services in Office Practice: What Do Patients Want and Do They Get It?. Arch Intern Med 163: 1673-1681 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Brehaut, J. C., O'Connor, A. M., Wood, T. J., Hack, T. F., Siminoff, L., Gordon, E., Feldman-Stewart, D. (2003). Validation of a Decision Regret Scale. Med Decis Making 23: 281-292 [Abstract]  
  • Jadad, A. R, Rizo, C. A, Enkin, M. W (2003). I am a good patient, believe it or not. BMJ 326: 1293-1295 [Full text]  
  • Whelan, T., Sawka, C., Levine, M., Gafni, A., Reyno, L., Willan, A., Julian, J., Dent, S., Abu-Zahra, H., Chouinard, E., Tozer, R., Pritchard, K., Bodendorfer, I. (2003). Helping Patients Make Informed Choices: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 581-587 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Elwyn, G, Edwards, A, Wensing, M, Hood, K, Atwell, C, Grol, R (2003). Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 93-99 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kennedy, A. D. M., Sculpher, M. J., Coulter, A., Dwyer, N., Rees, M., Abrams, K. R., Horsley, S., Cowley, D., Kidson, C., Kirwin, C., Naish, C., Stirrat, G. (2002). Effects of Decision Aids for Menorrhagia on Treatment Choices, Health Outcomes, and Costs: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 288: 2701-2708 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Walter, F. M, Britten, N. (2002). Patients' understanding of risk: a qualitative study of decision-making about the menopause and hormone replacement therapy in general practice. Fam Pract 19: 579-586 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wennberg, J. E (2002). Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ 325: 961-964 [Full text]  
  • Straus, S. E., Majumdar, S. R., McAlister, F. A. (2002). New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Clinical Applications. JAMA 288: 1396-1398 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mulley, A. G. Jr., Sepucha, K. (2002). Making Good Decisions about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention. ANN INTERN MED 137: 52-54 [Full text]  
  • Coulter, A. (2002). After Bristol: putting patients at the centre. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 186-188 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Straus, S. E (2002). Individualizing Treatment Decisions: The Likelihood of Being Helped or Harmed. Eval Health Prof 25: 210-224 [Abstract]  
  • Sepucha, K. R., Belkora, J. K., Mutchnick, S., Esserman, L. J. (2002). Consultation Planning to Help Breast Cancer Patients Prepare for Medical Consultations: Effect on Communication and Satisfaction for Patients and Physicians. JCO 20: 2695-2700 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Cathain, A, Walters, S J, Nicholl, J P, Thomas, K J, Kirkham, M (2002). Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice. BMJ 324: 643-643 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coulter, A., Dunn, N. (2002). After Bristol: putting patients at the centre * Commentary: Patient centred care: timely, but is it practical?. BMJ 324: 648-651 [Full text]  
  • Thomson, R., Robinson, A., Greenaway, J., Lowe, P. (2002). Development and description of a decision analysis based decision support tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 25-31 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thomson, R., Clarke, A. (2002). Commentary. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 38-39 [Full text]  
  • Vincent, C A, Coulter, A (2002). Patient safety: what about the patient?. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 76-80 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ruland, C. M. (2002). Handheld Technology to Improve Patient Care: Evaluating a Support System for Preference-based Care Planning at the Bedside. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9: 192-201 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Greenhalgh, T., Wright, P., Murray, E., Haines, A., Tai, S. S., Davis, H., Gray, A., Coulter, A. (2002). Use of interactive multimedia decision aids. BMJ 324: 296-296 [Full text]  
  • Barry, M. J. (2002). Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice. ANN INTERN MED 136: 127-135 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lip, G. Y.H., Kamath, S., Jafri, M., Mohammed, A., Bareford, D., McAlister, F. A. (2002). Ethnic Differences in Patient Perceptions of Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation Therapy: The West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project * Editorial Comment: The West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project. Stroke 33: 238-242 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • JOHNSON, S. R., DUNN, B. K., ANTHONY, M. (2001). Defining Benefits and Risks for SERMs in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 949: 304-314 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Levine, M., Whelan, T. (2001). Decision-Making Process--Communicating Risk/Benefits: Is There an Ideal Technique?. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001: 143-145 [Full text]  
  • Grol, R. (2001). Improving the Quality of Medical Care: Building Bridges Among Professional Pride, Payer Profit, and Patient Satisfaction. JAMA 286: 2578-2585 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Donovan, J. L, Frankel, S. J, Neal, D. E, Hamdy, F. C (2001). Screening for prostate cancer in the UK. BMJ 323: 763-764 [Full text]  
  • Kravitz, R. L, Melnikow, J. (2001). Engaging patients in medical decision making. BMJ 323: 584-585 [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A, Elwyn, G (2001). Developing professional ability to involve patients in their care: pull or push?. Qual Saf Health Care 10: 129-130 [Full text]  
  • Sowden, A J, Forbes, C, Entwistle, V, Watt, I (2001). Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer. Qual Saf Health Care 10: 193-196 [Full text]  
  • Deyo, R. A (2001). A key medical decision maker: the patient. BMJ 323: 466-467 [Full text]  
  • Murray, E., Davis, H., Tai, S. S., Coulter, A., Gray, A., Haines, A. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care. BMJ 323: 490-490 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bowling, A, Ebrahim, S (2001). Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Qual Saf Health Care 10: i2-8 [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A, Elwyn, G (2001). Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences. Qual Saf Health Care 10: i9-13 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bastian, L. A., Lipkus, I. M., Kuchibhatla, M. N., Weng, H. H., Halabi, S., Ryan, P. D., Skinner, C. S., Rimer, B. K. (2001). Women's Interest in Chemoprevention for Breast Cancer. Arch Intern Med 161: 1639-1644 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'connor, A. (2001). Using patient decision aids to promote evidence-based decision making. Evid. Based Med. 6: 100-102 [Full text]  
  • Radwin, L. E (2001). A video programme plus a booklet was more effective than a booklet alone for increasing patient knowledge about lumbar spine treatment options for low back pain. Evid. Based Nurs. 4: 84-84 [Full text]  
  • Montgomery, A. A, Harding, J., Fahey, T. (2001). Shared decision making in hypertension: the impact of patient preferences on treatment choice. Fam Pract 18: 309-313 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • DAVIES, T. (2001). Informed consent in psychiatric research. Br. J. Psychiatry 178: 397-398 [Full text]  
  • Jones, R. B, Atkinson, J. M, Coia, D. A, Paterson, L., Morton, A R., McKenna, K., Craig, N., Morrison, J., Gilmour, W H. (2001). Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients with schizophrenia. BMJ 322: 835-840 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Entwistle, V., Coulter, A., O'Connor, A., Rovner, D. R (2001). Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal. BMJ 322: 664-667 [Full text]  
  • Molenaar, S., Sprangers, M. A., Rutgers, E. J. Th., Luiten, E. J., Mulder, J., Bossuyt, P. M., van Everdingen, J. J., Oosterveld, P., de Haes, H. C. (2001). Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life. JCO 19: 1676-1687 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., Payne, S. (2001). Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 322: 468-468 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Straus, S. E, McAlister, F. (2001). Applying the results of trials and systematic reviews to our individual patients. Evid. Based Ment. Health 4: 6-7 [Full text]  
  • Clark, J. A., Wray, N. P., Ashton, C. M. (2001). Living With Treatment Decisions: Regrets and Quality of Life Among Men Treated for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JCO 19: 72-80 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Robinson, A, Thomson, R G (2000). The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 238-244 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thornett, A., Cantekin, E. I, King, E., Lilford, R J, Braunholtz, D., Sandhu, G, Saleh, H A, Wright, T, Damoiseaux, R A M J, van Balen, F A M, Hoes, A W, Verheij, T J M, de Melker, R A (2000). Amoxicillin for otitis media in general practice. BMJ 321: 765-765 [Full text]  
  • Guyatt, G. H., Haynes, R. B., Jaeschke, R. Z., Cook, D. J., Green, L., Naylor, C. D., Wilson, M. C., Richardson, W. S., for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, (2000). Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care. JAMA 284: 1290-1296 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Detmer, D. E (2000). Information technology for quality health care: a summary of United Kingdom and United States experiences. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 181-189 [Full text]  
  • McAlister, F. A., O'Connor, A. M., Wells, G., Grover, S. A., Laupacis, A. (2000). When should hypertension be treated? The different perspectives of Canadian family physicians and patients. CMAJ 163: 403-408 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McAlister, F. A., Straus, S. E., Guyatt, G. H., Haynes, R. B., for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, (2000). Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XX. Integrating Research Evidence With the Care of the Individual Patient. JAMA 283: 2829-2836 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Protheroe, J., Fahey, T., Montgomery, A. A, Peters, T. J, Smeeth, L. (2000). The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis Commentary: patients, preferences, and evidence. BMJ 320: 1380-1384 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Harris, R. (2000). What Is the Right Cancer Screening Rate?. ANN INTERN MED 132: 732-734 [Full text]  
  • Caress, A.-L. (2000). Review: healthcare decision aids improve knowledge, decrease decisional conflict, and increase active participation. Evid. Based Nurs. 3: 45-45 [Full text]  
  • McNutt, R. (2000). Review: health care decision aids improve knowledge, decrease decisional conflict, and increase active participation. Evid. Based Med. 5: 60-60 [Full text]  
  • Barry, M. J. (1999). Involving Patients in Medical Decisions: How Can Physicians Do Better?. JAMA 282: 2356-2357 [Full text]  
  • (1999). Decision Aids for Patients Are Somewhat Helpful. JWatch General 1999: 7-7 [Full text]  
  • Coulter, A. (1999). Paternalism or partnership?. BMJ 319: 719-720 [Full text]  



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview